Cyrillic considerations


Non-Latin names are not new, but gTLDs are bringing them like never before. PETOŠEVIĆ ’s Tatyana Kulikova examines the Russian example

The TLD .РФ (.rf in Latin) was the first Cyrillic TLD of the IDNA (Internationalising Domain Names in Applications) system. It was delegated to Russia in May 2010, but the idea had been around since 2001.

At the beginning of this year, Macedonia launched its Cyrillic TLD, .мкд (.mkd in Latin), and on 1 March, Belarus launched .бел (.bel in Latin), its own Cyrillic domain. That was the sixth TLD after Russia’s, Serbia’s (.срб, or .srb in Latin), Kazakhstan’s (.каз, or .kaz in Latin), Ukraine’s (.укр, or .ukr in Latin) and Macedonia’s. The Cyrillic TLDs of Mongolia (.мон, or .mon in Latin) and Bulgaria (.бг, or .bg in Latin) will be launched in the near future.

A Cyrillic domain name in the .rf TLD can be registered if it meets the following requirements:
  • Ends with .rf in Cyrillic;

  • Contains a minimum of two and a maximum of 63 symbols (letters, digits and hyphens);/li>
  • Starts and ends with a Cyrillic letter or digit; and

  • A full list of allowed symbols is published on unicode.org


  • From the beginning, the Coordination Center for TLD RU/RF, the administrator of the national TLDs .ru and .РФ, applied the first-to-file system. For the moment, there are no restrictions for non-residents of Russia.

    The coordination centre opened the reservation procedure on 25 November 2009, before the official delegation of the TLD (12 May 2010). Within the sunrise period (from 25 November 2009 until 11 May 2010), trademark owners could reserve a Cyrillic domain name identical to the trademark valid in Russia as of the date of filing the domain name application.

    According to the Rules on Priority Registration of Domains, in order to register a Cyrillic domain, the trademark owner should submit a Certificate of Registration for the valid trademark that: “Reproduces in full a word element of the trademark or is identical to a word element of the trademark after removal of hyphens or replacement of spaces with hyphens. Herewith, the word element of the trademark must include at least one protected element.”

    Russian registrars began to collect domain name applications from their clients long before 25 November 2009, in order to be first in the queue of trademark owners. Nevertheless, the sunrise period that started at the end of November 2009 was put on hold the following day. As the coordination centre revealed, on the first day of the sunrise period, one company, Tsetis, reserved domain names such as cinema.rf, sex.rf, bank.rf, and dating.rf.

    Of course, Russian internet users were indignant at the reservation of the most popular and merchantable domains in the name of one company.

    However, it was revealed that Tsetis registered the relevant domain names (sex, cinema, bank, all in Russian) in different Nice classes (irrelevant to the nature of the trademarks, like international classes 6, 7 or 11), meaning that they formally complied with all requirements of the sunrise period.


    After long deliberation and studying different amendments to the rules, the reservation procedure was reopened on 10 December 2009. The first phase of the sunrise period concluded on 11 May 2010.

    During the second phase of the sunrise period (15 July to 30 September 2010), the following persons/groups had a priority right to Cyrillic domains:
  • Trademark owners;

  • Company name owners;

  • Appellation of origin holders;

  • Non-commercial organisations registered in Russia; and

  • Mass media organisations.


  • Soon afterwards, the coordination centre faced yet another problem, because the number of applications for mass media registration substantially increased: three in April 2010, 36 in May 2010, and 900 in June 2010 (such as books.rf and building.rf, all in Russian).

    Of course, both the coordination centre and Roscomnadzor (the official body authorised to supervise mass media in Russia) sounded the alarm and connected such activity in the field of mass media with the sunrise period in the Cyrillic .rf TLD.

    The coordination centre reacted immediately and on 13 July 2010, it approved a new version of the rules, according to which only those mass media holders whose rights were registered before 11 May 2010 were able to participate in the sunrise period.

    However, a few Cyrillic domains, generic in nature, (such as delivery.rf, beer.rf and vodka.rf) were registered during the sunrise period on the basis of mass media registrations.

    On 11 November 2010, the coordination centre launched the third phase, which was open to the general public. The first Cyrillic domains registered within that period were president.rf and government.rf (all in Russian).

    It should be noted that during the first hour of the open phase, the coordination centre registered more than 100,000 Cyrillic domains, and during the first week the number of Cyrillic domains rose above 500,000.

    And despite the fact that non-residents could not register Cyrillic domains in the first year of the third phase, the registrars provided services allowing their foreign clients to register Cyrillic domains (they registered the domain in their own name and then, in a year, transferred the domains to their foreign clients).

    On 28 March 2015, the total number of registered Cyrillic domains stood at 831,903 (less than the total number of domains registered at the end of 2011, 937,000, but it has been more or less the same for over three years).

    Currently, it is possible to register Cyrillic domains in the TLD .москва (.moscow), .дети (.children), .орг (.org), and .онлайн (.online).

    Despite the sunrise period for trademark owners lasting about 10 months, some trademark owners failed to register Cyrillic domain names in due time, and several disputes regarding .rf domains have been brought before the courts.

    When considering domain name disputes, judges take into account factors such as: any use and duration of use of the domain name; whether the domain name owner acted in bad faith or not; and why the trademark owner did not exercise its right to register the domain name during the sunrise period.
    Features
    The latest features from IPPro The Internet
    As the UK shifts closer to its eventual departure from the EU, the country’s intellectual property industry assesses its options and looks to avoid a cliff edge. Kate O’Rourke, president of the Chartered Institute of Trademark Attorneys, explains
    Vladimir Biriulin of Gorodissky discusses the technical knowledge that the Russian IP Court has developed over its four-year tenure
    Join Our Newsletter

    Sign up today and never
    miss the latest news or an issue again

    Subscribe now
    With EU copyright reforms coming to a head, Barney Dixon speaks to Raegan MacDonald to see how the landscape has changed in recent months
    Le Quang Vinh of Bross & Partners examines the substantive changes to criminal law in Vietnam that promise to rein in counterfeiting and piracy
    As EU copyright reform continues, publishers are insisting the press publisher’s right will be good for business and won’t harm consumers. Angela Mills Wade of the European Publishers Council explains
    ECTA’s copyright committee was formed in response to the modernisation of the EU’s approach to copyright. Chair Dr Christian Freudenberg tells Mark Dugdale what this has meant in practice
    ECTA has ramped up its efforts to ensure that IP rights are heard in Brexit negotiations. But this isn’t all the trademark association has been up to in the past year, as Ruta Olmane explains
    William Dyer III and Bea Koempel-Thomas of Lee & Hayes examine TC Heartland v Kraft and the arguments put forward in support of each party
    Country profiles
    The latest country profiles from IPPro The Internet
    While Indian fair use is not explicit, provisions exist for the fair dealing of copyright. Rohit Singh and Tina Canneth of Abu-Ghazeleh Intellectual Property delve deeper
    An interpretation of the current events exception in Radosavljević is creative, say BDK Advokati's Bogdan Ivanišević and Marko Popović
    IPPro Patents

    Visit our sister site
    for all the latest IP patents news and analysis

    ippropatents.com
    Yu-Li Tsai of Deep & Far examines how damages are calculated in patent infringement litigation
    A recent amendment will make costly annulments a thing of the past. Gilberto Sanchez of SPECyF explains
    New legislation in Turkey promises a swathe of trademark changes. Dr Cahit Suluk of Cahit Suluk Intellectual Property Law Firm explains
    A trademark decision clarified ‘against the public order’ as an absolute ground for refusal. Sár and Partners – Danubia Patent & Law Office reports
    Bogdan Ivanišević and Marko Popović of BDK Advokati review the recent squabble about copyright protection for ‘routinely created photos’
    Alston & Bird recently expanded with a new office focusing on counselling Chinese companies on US intellectual property law. Yitai Hu explains what patent owners face when working across borders
    Interviews
    The latest interviews from IPPro The Internet