18 January 2018
Reporter: Barney Dixon

TWiT sues Twitter for trademark infringement, is suing Twitter for breach of contract, unfair competition and trademark infringement, stemming from a deal the two companies made in 2007.

According to TWiT’s complaint, filed in the US District Court for the Northern District of California on 6 March 2007, one of Twitter’s co-founders Evan Williams appeared on TWiT’s net@night programme alongside TWiT owner Leo Laporte, and discussed his new company, Twitter, which was to be a text-based microblogging service.

The two acknowledged the similarity of the Twitter brand and TWiT mark on the show, and later agreed to a basis of coexistence between the two trademarks, conditioned on each company continuing with its own unique distribution platform.

Twitter’s would focus on communication through unique 140 character bursts, and TWiT on the distribution of audio and video content via streaming on the internet.

The lawsuit alleged that in 2009 Twitter was reportedly planning to expand its services to video content under the Twitter brand, contrary to the previous agreement.

Laporte contacted Williams, who had become Twitter’s CEO, with his concerns. Williams responded that the news reports were “not accurate” and said: “Don’t worry: we’re not expanding to audio or video under the Twitter brand.”

However, in May 2017, Twitter announced “premium video content” that was coming to the platform. This “video content” includes the streaming and downloading of video content over the internet.

In July, TWiT sent correspondence to Twitter demanding that it cease its plans to expand the use of the Twitter trademark. Since then, it said it has “engaged in communications with the goal of informally resolving this dispute”.

“These efforts have not resolved the dispute and Twitter continues its expansion into TWiT’s business in breach of its agreement with [TWiT] refuting its representations and promises made, and infringing on [TWiT’s] intellectual property rights”.

TWiT argued that Twitter’s use of the Twitter trademark in connection with these new products is “a breach of its promise to and agreement with TWiT and Laporte, and creates a likelihood of confusion with the TWiT mark”.

TWiT is seeking damages and all gains, profits and advantages derived from Twitter’s video streaming platform.

More trademarks news
The latest news from IPPro The Internet
Join Our Newsletter

Sign up today and never
miss the latest news or an issue again

Subscribe now
Man fined more than £500,000 for counterfeit selling
16 February 2018 | Stafford | Reporter: Barney Dixon
A man who bought counterfeit DVDs from China and sold them as genuine products on eBay has been fined £567,000 following 16 months of imprisonment
EIP hires trademark head
13 February 2018 | London | Reporter: Barney Dixon
Intellectual property law firm EIP has hired Claire Lehr as head of its trademark practice
Comerica Banks wins UDRP
01 February 2018 | Geneva | Reporter: Barney Dixon
Comerica Bank has won a UDRP dispute at the World IP Organisation Arbitration and Mediation Centre
Three-quarters of brands suffer trademark infringement
22 January 2018 | Boston | Reporter: Barney Dixon
Almost three-quarters of brands have been victims of trademark infringement in the past year, according to a new survey from trademark research and protection firm CompuMark
TWiT sues Twitter for trademark infringement
18 January 2018 | California | Reporter: Barney Dixon, is suing Twitter for breach of contract, unfair competition and trademark infringement, stemming from a deal the two companies made in 2007
Alibaba refutes Notorious Markets report
15 January 2018 | Hangzhou | Reporter: Barney Dixon
Alibaba has issued a point by point refutation against allegations levelled at its Taobao platform in the US Trade Representative’s 2017 Special 301 Out-of-Cycle Review of Notorious Markets
USTR targets Taobao in Notorious Markets review
12 January 2018 | Washington DC | Reporter: Barney Dixon
US Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer has revealed the findings of his office’s 2017 Special 301 Out-of-Cycle Review of Notorious Markets, including accusations against Alibaba’s Taobao ecommerce platform