Budapest
29 June 2017
Reporter: Mark Dugdale

IP Translator fails to be understood


Efforts at the Court of Justice for the EU (CJEU) to untangle the codification of 2012’s IP Translator judgement are far from over.

Two cases currently with or recently ruled upon at the CJEU, Cactus (C‑501/15 P) and Brandconcern (C‑577/14 P), appear to have interpreted the IP Translator judgement differently than was intended, sparking some uncertainty for trademark owners.

Following the IP Translator case and its codification in the EU trademark legislative reform package, applicants must file in specific goods and services, indicating with sufficient clarity and precision what they aim to protect.

The new Article 28(8) of the EU Trademark Regulation allowed a period of six months for trademark owners to add new products/services to their EU trademarks filed before 22 June 2012.

Cactus and Brandconcern, however, have indicated that IP Translator does not apply to trademarks that had been registered before the date of the judgement.

According to Sarka Petivlasova, senior associate at Hogan Lovells, the CJEU’s February ruling in Brandconcern indicated that IP Translator has no retroactive effect, meaning that trademarks registered before 21 June 2012 cannot be amended.

The CJEU also seemed to suggest that EU trademarks can protect goods and services outside of the literal meaning of the included class headings.

Cactus, while still under consideration, has received a preliminary opinion from the advocate general, who went one step further and said EU trademarks could potentially cover all goods and services that fall within the class concerned.

As the advocate general noted in Cactus: “Consequently, Brandconcern does not constitute an authority validating [the EU Intellectual Property Office’s] approach … in relation to the assumption that a trademark registered before the cut-off date of 21 June 2012 can at most afford protection to the goods or services mentioned in the relevant alphabetical list.”

“By the same token, Brandconcern should not be read as precluding, from the outset, that protection afforded by trademarks registered before the judgement in IP Translator was given could extend beyond the goods and services referred to in the alphabetical list of a given class.”

Petivlasova added: “It remains to be seen whether the advocate general’s opinion in Cactus will be followed.”

More trademarks news
The latest news from IPPro The Internet
Join Our Newsletter

Sign up today and never
miss the latest news or an issue again

Subscribe now
China world’s top trademark filer in 2016
07 December 2017 | Geneva | Reporter: Barney Dixon
China was the world’s top trademark filer in 2016, with the country accounting for 3.7 million applications out of an estimated global total of 7 million
Brexit could cause major financial impact to UK trademark business
05 December 2017 | London | Reporter: Barney Dixon
UK-based trademark lawyers could lose as much as £17 million a year as a direct result of Brexit
INTA reveals Brexit position
30 November 2017 | Brussels | Reporter: Barney Dixon
The International Trademark Association has revealed its position on Brexit, outlining five core principles that should be supported, promoted and safeguarded when the UK leaves the EU
Woof-Tang Clan in the dog house
23 November 2017 | New York | Reporter: Barney Dixon
The leader of rap group the Wu-Tang Clan has filed a trademark opposition against dog walking company, the Woof-Tang Clan
Brexit a “material threat” to businesses, says Marques
20 November 2017 | Leicester | Reporter: Barney Dixon
Brexit could be a “material threat” to businesses that own trademarks in the EU, according to a position paper from intellectual property association Marques
Incopro opens Wales office
02 November 2017 | Caerphilly | Reporter: Barney Dixon
Incopro has expanded its presence to Caerphilly, Wales as part of a drive to fight against counterfeits in the UK
Turkey takes step towards harmonising with EU IP laws
01 November 2017 | Ankara | Reporter: Barney Dixon
The Turkish Patent and Trademark Office has released new guidelines for trademarks in an attempt to bring Turkish intellectual property law in line with the EU