Arizona
27 January 2017
Reporter: Barney Dixon

Copying Karaoke CDs is not trademark infringement, says court


Copying karaoke CDs onto computers for use in performances in no way constitutes trademark infringement, according to the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.

The ruling, which came earlier this month, centred on Slep-Tone Entertainment, which lodged the Lanham Act complaint against Wired for Sound Karaoke and DJ Services, alleging that Wired’s karaoke shows used unauthorised “media-shifted” files copied onto computer hard drives from Slep-Tone CDs.

The Ninth Circuit affirmed an earlier decision from the US District Court for the District of Arizona, which said that Slep-Tone “did not state a claim under the Lanham Act because there was no likelihood of consumer confusion about the origin of a good properly cognisable in claim of trademark infringement”.

Section 43(a) of the Lanham Act sets out the remedies that can be sought when a trademark is infringed and introduces the “likelihood of confusion” standard for infringement of an unregistered trademark or trade dress.

The Ninth Circuit ruled that Slep-Tone’s theory, which argued that because the media-shifted files displayed its trademarks and trade dress when performed, consumers would be confused about their origin, “does not involve consumer confusion about the source of an appropriate ‘good,’ as that concept has been defined by the Supreme Court. Instead, it alleges possible confusion over the source of content.”

Although Wired may have created a new good by copying Slep-Tone’s CDs to hard drives, “it is still not a relevant good under the Lanham Act”.

Those who see Wired’s performances of Slep-Tone’s karaoke tracks would not be confused about “the source of the tangible good sold in the marketplace”, the Ninth Circuit ruled.

More trademarks news
The latest news from IPPro The Internet
Join Our Newsletter

Sign up today and never
miss the latest news or an issue again

Subscribe now
Three-quarters of brands suffer trademark infringement
22 January 2018 | Boston | Reporter: Barney Dixon
Almost three-quarters of brands have been victims of trademark infringement in the past year, according to a new survey from trademark research and protection firm CompuMark
TWiT sues Twitter for trademark infringement
18 January 2018 | California | Reporter: Barney Dixon
TWiT.tv, is suing Twitter for breach of contract, unfair competition and trademark infringement, stemming from a deal the two companies made in 2007
Alibaba refutes Notorious Markets report
15 January 2018 | Hangzhou | Reporter: Barney Dixon
Alibaba has issued a point by point refutation against allegations levelled at its Taobao platform in the US Trade Representative’s 2017 Special 301 Out-of-Cycle Review of Notorious Markets
USTR targets Taobao in Notorious Markets review
12 January 2018 | Washington DC | Reporter: Barney Dixon
US Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer has revealed the findings of his office’s 2017 Special 301 Out-of-Cycle Review of Notorious Markets, including accusations against Alibaba’s Taobao ecommerce platform
Birkenstock terminates relationship with Amazon
15 December 2017 | Neustadt | Reporter: Barney Dixon
Shoe maker Birkenstock has ended its business relations with Amazon EU, accusing the ecommerce company of failing to prevent violations of the law on its marketplace platform
China world’s top trademark filer in 2016
07 December 2017 | Geneva | Reporter: Barney Dixon
China was the world’s top trademark filer in 2016, with the country accounting for 3.7 million applications out of an estimated global total of 7 million
Brexit could cause major financial impact to UK trademark business
05 December 2017 | London | Reporter: Barney Dixon
UK-based trademark lawyers could lose as much as £17 million a year as a direct result of Brexit