London
02 December 2016
Reporter: Barney Dixon

My spa will go on: Titanic trademark dispute


Titanic Spa has won a High Court decision to “protect its brand” following alleged trademark infringement by the Titanic Hotel Liverpool.

The spa’s operators, Property Renaissance, brought action against Titanic Hotel two years after the hotel’s opening, citing customer confusion and saying the spa had received calls and emails from customers who believed the two were the same entity.

Titanic Spa’s owners then commenced legal action to protect their “hugely successful business and brand”.

Judge Henry Carr ruled that Titanic Spa’s trademark had been infringed by the hotels actions and that consumers had been confused between the two companies.

Carr held that the Titanic Hotel must take steps to reduce the chance of confusion, including placing a disclaimer on its website and ceasing to use the word ‘spa’ in its materials.

Amy Burton, director of operations at Titanic Spa, said: “The decision to go to court was not one we took lightly. We are well known in the industry and we have no fear of healthy competition but we couldn’t stand by and allow our brand to be diluted in this way.”

“No business owner wants to go to court, devoting resources to litigation rather than building on their success. But one of the reasons we have been so successful ... is that we have invested a lot to build a strong and recognisable brand.”

Taylor Wessing represented Titanic Spa in the litigation, with Jo Joyce acting as the spa’s solicitor.

Joyce said: “Titanic Spa has spent over two years dealing with the customer confusion that has arisen as a result of the infringement of its intellectual property rights.”

“We are hopeful that, in the light of this decision, changes will be made to ensure that such confusion ceases.”

More trademarks news
The latest news from IPPro The Internet
Join Our Newsletter

Sign up today and never
miss the latest news or an issue again

Subscribe now
Three-quarters of brands suffer trademark infringement
22 January 2018 | Boston | Reporter: Barney Dixon
Almost three-quarters of brands have been victims of trademark infringement in the past year, according to a new survey from trademark research and protection firm CompuMark
TWiT sues Twitter for trademark infringement
18 January 2018 | California | Reporter: Barney Dixon
TWiT.tv, is suing Twitter for breach of contract, unfair competition and trademark infringement, stemming from a deal the two companies made in 2007
Alibaba refutes Notorious Markets report
15 January 2018 | Hangzhou | Reporter: Barney Dixon
Alibaba has issued a point by point refutation against allegations levelled at its Taobao platform in the US Trade Representative’s 2017 Special 301 Out-of-Cycle Review of Notorious Markets
USTR targets Taobao in Notorious Markets review
12 January 2018 | Washington DC | Reporter: Barney Dixon
US Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer has revealed the findings of his office’s 2017 Special 301 Out-of-Cycle Review of Notorious Markets, including accusations against Alibaba’s Taobao ecommerce platform
Birkenstock terminates relationship with Amazon
15 December 2017 | Neustadt | Reporter: Barney Dixon
Shoe maker Birkenstock has ended its business relations with Amazon EU, accusing the ecommerce company of failing to prevent violations of the law on its marketplace platform
China world’s top trademark filer in 2016
07 December 2017 | Geneva | Reporter: Barney Dixon
China was the world’s top trademark filer in 2016, with the country accounting for 3.7 million applications out of an estimated global total of 7 million
Brexit could cause major financial impact to UK trademark business
05 December 2017 | London | Reporter: Barney Dixon
UK-based trademark lawyers could lose as much as £17 million a year as a direct result of Brexit