London
02 December 2016
Reporter: Barney Dixon
My spa will go on: Titanic trademark dispute
Titanic Spa has won a High Court decision to “protect its brand” following alleged trademark infringement by the Titanic Hotel Liverpool.

The spa’s operators, Property Renaissance, brought action against Titanic Hotel two years after the hotel’s opening, citing customer confusion and saying the spa had received calls and emails from customers who believed the two were the same entity.

Titanic Spa’s owners then commenced legal action to protect their “hugely successful business and brand”.

Judge Henry Carr ruled that Titanic Spa’s trademark had been infringed by the hotels actions and that consumers had been confused between the two companies.

Carr held that the Titanic Hotel must take steps to reduce the chance of confusion, including placing a disclaimer on its website and ceasing to use the word ‘spa’ in its materials.

Amy Burton, director of operations at Titanic Spa, said: “The decision to go to court was not one we took lightly. We are well known in the industry and we have no fear of healthy competition but we couldn’t stand by and allow our brand to be diluted in this way.”

“No business owner wants to go to court, devoting resources to litigation rather than building on their success. But one of the reasons we have been so successful ... is that we have invested a lot to build a strong and recognisable brand.”

Taylor Wessing represented Titanic Spa in the litigation, with Jo Joyce acting as the spa’s solicitor.

Joyce said: “Titanic Spa has spent over two years dealing with the customer confusion that has arisen as a result of the infringement of its intellectual property rights.”

“We are hopeful that, in the light of this decision, changes will be made to ensure that such confusion ceases.”

More trademarks news
The latest news from IPPro The Internet
Join Our Newsletter

Sign up today and never
miss the latest news or an issue again

Subscribe now
‘One size fits all’ not for Asia
24 May 2017 | Barcelona | Reporter: Mark Dugdale
Enforcement approaches should differ across the continent, said Lee & Ko’s John Kim at the 2017 INTA Annual Meeting
Notice and takedown systems ‘not efficient’
23 May 2017 | Barcelona | Reporter: Barney Dixon
Speaking at the 2017 INTA Annual Meeting, Oliver de Crombret outlined how current notice and takedown systems are not efficient in tackling online counterfeits
Cooperation needed to combat counterfeits
23 May 2017 | Barcelona | Reporter: Barney Dixon
Speaking at the 2017 INTA Annual Meeting, eBay’s Louise Delcroix expressed the need for improved cooperation between brand owners, ecommerce platforms and public authorities
INTA reveals 2018-2021 strategic plan
22 May 2017 | Barcelona | Reporter: Barney Dixon
INTA president Joe Ferretti and INTA CEO Etienne Sanz de Acedo unveiled a multi-year plan to encourage innovation, communicate brand power and protect its members’ rights
Trademark attorneys must become ‘brand ambassadors’
22 May 2017 | Barcelona | Reporter: Barney Dixon
Speaking at the 2017 Annual Meeting, INTA president Joe Ferretti outlined how trademark attorneys should become “brand stewards”
Thought leadership important for trademark attorneys
21 May 2017 | Barcelona | Reporter: Barney Dixon
Trademark attorneys should look to publish their own content online to ensure the “progression of the law”
DVD ring sentenced to prison
17 May 2017 | Suffolk | Reporter: Barney Dixon
Four men have received prison sentences after a FACT investigation into their pirate DVD operation worth more than £500,000