London
02 December 2016
Reporter: Barney Dixon
My spa will go on: Titanic trademark dispute
Titanic Spa has won a High Court decision to “protect its brand” following alleged trademark infringement by the Titanic Hotel Liverpool.

The spa’s operators, Property Renaissance, brought action against Titanic Hotel two years after the hotel’s opening, citing customer confusion and saying the spa had received calls and emails from customers who believed the two were the same entity.

Titanic Spa’s owners then commenced legal action to protect their “hugely successful business and brand”.

Judge Henry Carr ruled that Titanic Spa’s trademark had been infringed by the hotels actions and that consumers had been confused between the two companies.

Carr held that the Titanic Hotel must take steps to reduce the chance of confusion, including placing a disclaimer on its website and ceasing to use the word ‘spa’ in its materials.

Amy Burton, director of operations at Titanic Spa, said: “The decision to go to court was not one we took lightly. We are well known in the industry and we have no fear of healthy competition but we couldn’t stand by and allow our brand to be diluted in this way.”

“No business owner wants to go to court, devoting resources to litigation rather than building on their success. But one of the reasons we have been so successful ... is that we have invested a lot to build a strong and recognisable brand.”

Taylor Wessing represented Titanic Spa in the litigation, with Jo Joyce acting as the spa’s solicitor.

Joyce said: “Titanic Spa has spent over two years dealing with the customer confusion that has arisen as a result of the infringement of its intellectual property rights.”

“We are hopeful that, in the light of this decision, changes will be made to ensure that such confusion ceases.”

More trademarks news
The latest news from IPPro The Internet
Join Our Newsletter

Sign up today and never
miss the latest news or an issue again

Subscribe now
Hong Kong, Albania and Panama among key counterfeit transit points
23 June 2017 | Alicante | Reporter: Barney Dixon
Hong Kong, Albania and Panama are among several key transit points for counterfeits worldwide
Majority of brands face online infringement
12 June 2017 | London | Reporter: Barney Dixon
More than 90 percent of brand owners have experienced intellectual property infringement online, according to Hogan Lovells
US Customs launches anti-counterfeiting education campaign
09 June 2017 | Washington DC | Reporter: Barney Dixon
US Customs and Border Protection, with support from the GIPC, has launched a campaign to inform the public of the dangers of counterfeit goods
Wynne-Jones sets up London office
06 June 2017 | London | Reporter: Barney Dixon
IP boutique Wynne-Jones has set up a new office in London as a result of a surge of interest in brand and invention protection
‘One size fits all’ not for Asia
24 May 2017 | Barcelona | Reporter: Barney Dixon
Enforcement approaches should differ across the continent, said Lee & Ko’s John Kim at the 2017 INTA Annual Meeting
Notice and takedown systems ‘not efficient’
23 May 2017 | Barcelona | Reporter: Barney Dixon
Speaking at the 2017 INTA Annual Meeting, Oliver de Crombret outlined how current notice and takedown systems are not efficient in tackling online counterfeits
Cooperation needed to combat counterfeits
23 May 2017 | Barcelona | Reporter: Barney Dixon
Speaking at the 2017 INTA Annual Meeting, eBay’s Louise Delcroix expressed the need for improved cooperation between brand owners, ecommerce platforms and public authorities