27 March 2017
Reporter: Mark Dugdale
Court tells bee trap maker to buzz off
A manufacturer of bee traps who tried to sting eBay for alleged patent infringement committed by users of its marketplace has lost a summary judgement ruling in district court.

The US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama issued a summary judgement in favour of eBay on 20 March, holding that the marketplace operator did not directly or indirectly infringe Carpenter Bee Solutions owner Robert Blazer’s patent.

Blazer, owner of a patent for a carpenter bee trap, flagged copycat products for sale on the eBay marketplace, alleging infringement. His patent was pending at the time and eBay told him to come back when it was granted.

Once his patent was granted, Blazer sent notices to eBay through its Verified Rights Owner programme. These complaints were also rebuffed, because Blazer had no court order confirming infringement.

In his 2015 complaint to the Alabama district court, Blazer accused eBay of direct and contributory infringement of his patent, as well as inducing eBay users to infringe it.

Siding with eBay following its motion for summary judgement on the infringement claims, the district court pointed out that direct patent infringement requires a sale of, or offer to sell, an infringing product.

“Undoubtedly, an offer existed. The question is who made the offer. eBay? The user who created the listing? Both? eBay’s position is that if an offer exists, it cannot be genuinely disputed that the offer was made by the user, not eBay,” the court explained.

“In this case, the context of an exchange on eBay demonstrates that no reasonable consumer could conclude that by bidding on an eBay listing, he was accepting an offer from eBay itself. eBay’s terms of service explicitly advise users that eBay is not making an offer through a listing, and ... eBay lacks title and possession of the items listed.”

The court also ruled that eBay lacked the knowledge required to have induced users to infringe Blazer’s patent, and that it had not made itself wilfully blind. The contributory infringement claims also failed because no sale or offer for sale were made.

More Patents news
The latest news from IPPro The Internet
Join Our Newsletter

Sign up today and never
miss the latest news or an issue again

Subscribe now
WiLAN diversifies in wake of patent licensing challenges
20 April 2017 | Ottawa | Reporter: Mark Dugdale
WiLAN is acquiring an internet of things company for $47.4 million as it looks to diversify away from its core patent licensing business
Court tells bee trap maker to buzz off
27 March 2017 | Alabama | Reporter: Mark Dugdale
The US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama issued a summary judgement in favour of eBay on 20 March
Google must pay $20 million for Chrome infringement
15 February 2017 | Texas | Reporter: Barney Dixon
Google must pay $20 million in damages for infringement of four patents related to anti-malware
Trading tech patents upheld under Alice
19 January 2017 | Illinois | Reporter: Barney Dixon
Trading Technologies International’s electronic trading patents have been upheld under the Supreme Court’s decision in Alice v CLS Bank...
Ameranth to press on with mass infringement claims
16 January 2017 | California | Reporter: Barney Dixon
Internet solutions company Ameranth has been granted an order lifting the stay of more than 30 patent infringement cases, against defendants such as Pizza Hut, Oracle, Starbucks and Dominos...
McRO case denied en banc rehearing
06 January 2017 | Washington DC | Reporter: Barney Dixon
Bandai Namco Games America has been denied an en banc rehearing in its cornerstone software patent case against McRO...
Nokia and Apple resume hostilities
23 December 2016 | California | Reporter: Mark Dugdale
Nokia has lodged complaints against Apple in the Regional Courts in Dusseldorf, Mannheim and Munich, Germany, as well as in the US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas...