Washington DC
16 December 2016
Reporter: Barney Dixon
Forum shopping decision could reduce patent lawsuits
A US Supreme Court decision on forum shopping could lead to a reduction in patent lawsuits overall.

TC Heartland brought a patent case to the Supreme Court that asks whether the “patent venue statute, which provides that patent infringement actions ‘may be brought in the judicial district where the defendant resides’ is the sole and exclusive provision governing venue in patent infringement actions and is not to be supplemented by the statute governing ‘venue generally’, which has long contained a sub-section that, where applicable, deems a corporate entity to reside in multiple judicial districts”.

Experts say that if the Supreme Court rules in favour of ignoring the supplemented “venue generally” statute, there could be a reduction in the number of patent infringement suits filed overall, especially from so-called ‘patent trolls’.

Tom Duston, partner at Marshall, Gerstein & Borun, said: “The Supreme Court generally does not accept review of decisions of the Federal Circuit with the expectation of merely affirming those decisions.”

“The fact that the decision the Supreme Court has agreed to review is the denial of an extraordinary writ (ie, writ of mandamus) where the standard of review is exceedingly deferential to the Federal Circuit would seem to reinforce this expectation.”

He added: “The Supreme Court has rendered a number of decisions in the patent area recently that are hostile to the ‘patent litigation industry’ involving non-practicing entities. “

In agreement with Duston, Byron Pickard, director at Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox, added: “I would not be surprised to see a 9-0 vote in this case.”

“This case presents an issue reminiscent of the court’s recent decision in Daimler v Baumon, which was decided 9-0 and which severely cut back on the ability of plaintiffs to sue foreign companies in the U.S.”

“In many ways, this case presents the same underlying concerns as in Daimler about forum shopping and the fairness of forcing companies to defend suits where they have a limited presence.”

Duston said that a Supreme Court agreement with TC Heartland’s position were accepted, patent litigation would shift dramatically to the District of Delaware.

He said: “New filings in the Eastern District of Texas would dry up overnight. The more uncertain question is what would become of current cases that would now be pending in jurisdictions in which venue has now been declared improper.

“I suspect that courts with pending cases, and particularly the Eastern District of Texas, will look for rationales to continue overseeing those cases, especially those in which substantive actions have already occurred.”

Pickard agreed, saying: “I would expect a large downturn in the number of cases filed in the Eastern District of Texas, with many, if not most of those cases ending up in Delaware, Northern California, and New York because so many companies choose to incorporate in those states.”

More Patents news
The latest news from IPPro The Internet
Join Our Newsletter

Sign up today and never
miss the latest news or an issue again

Subscribe now
WiLAN diversifies in wake of patent licensing challenges
20 April 2017 | Ottawa | Reporter: Mark Dugdale
WiLAN is acquiring an internet of things company for $47.4 million as it looks to diversify away from its core patent licensing business
Court tells bee trap maker to buzz off
27 March 2017 | Alabama | Reporter: Mark Dugdale
The US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama issued a summary judgement in favour of eBay on 20 March
Google must pay $20 million for Chrome infringement
15 February 2017 | Texas | Reporter: Barney Dixon
Google must pay $20 million in damages for infringement of four patents related to anti-malware
Trading tech patents upheld under Alice
19 January 2017 | Illinois | Reporter: Barney Dixon
Trading Technologies International’s electronic trading patents have been upheld under the Supreme Court’s decision in Alice v CLS Bank...
Ameranth to press on with mass infringement claims
16 January 2017 | California | Reporter: Barney Dixon
Internet solutions company Ameranth has been granted an order lifting the stay of more than 30 patent infringement cases, against defendants such as Pizza Hut, Oracle, Starbucks and Dominos...
McRO case denied en banc rehearing
06 January 2017 | Washington DC | Reporter: Barney Dixon
Bandai Namco Games America has been denied an en banc rehearing in its cornerstone software patent case against McRO...
Nokia and Apple resume hostilities
23 December 2016 | California | Reporter: Mark Dugdale
Nokia has lodged complaints against Apple in the Regional Courts in Dusseldorf, Mannheim and Munich, Germany, as well as in the US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas...