Washington DC
26 August 2016
Reporter: Mark Dugdale
Google wants Supreme Court to calm construction
Google has asked the US Supreme Court to weigh in on how the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit deals with patent claim construction.

The internet company filed a petition for review in mid-August, asking the Supreme Court to clarify that a patent’s entire prosecution history be used in claim construction.

Google and two inventors came to blows in 2013. They accused the internet company of infringing patents for malware protection software with the Chrome web browser.

In 2015, the Federal Circuit overturned the lower court’s ruling that Google hadn’t infringed the patent.

The appeals court used the inventors’ definition of “web browser process” and ignored the prosecution history, because it didn’t clearly disavow what they had claimed.

Google argued in its petition for review that the Federal Circuit both ignored correct practice and skewed analyses towards "overbroad and acontextual" constructions by failing to consider the prosecution history.

“First, the uncertainty over which claim-construction rules will apply in any given case deprives the public of reasonable certainty regarding patents’ scope,” Google explained.

“Second, the Federal Circuit’s clear- and-unmistakable standard artificially restricts the courts’ consideration of important contextual evidence by rendering prosecution history all but irrelevant in the mine run of cases, and thereby skews the analysis toward overbroad and acontextual constructions.”

“The resulting uncertainty and overbreadth harm the very innovation the Patent Act is supposed to encourage and protect.”

More Patents news
The latest news from IPPro The Internet
Join Our Newsletter

Sign up today and never
miss the latest news or an issue again

Subscribe now
Court tells bee trap maker to buzz off
27 March 2017 | Alabama | Reporter: Mark Dugdale
The US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama issued a summary judgement in favour of eBay on 20 March
Google must pay $20 million for Chrome infringement
15 February 2017 | Texas | Reporter: Barney Dixon
Google must pay $20 million in damages for infringement of four patents related to anti-malware
Trading tech patents upheld under Alice
19 January 2017 | Illinois | Reporter: Barney Dixon
Trading Technologies International’s electronic trading patents have been upheld under the Supreme Court’s decision in Alice v CLS Bank...
Ameranth to press on with mass infringement claims
16 January 2017 | California | Reporter: Barney Dixon
Internet solutions company Ameranth has been granted an order lifting the stay of more than 30 patent infringement cases, against defendants such as Pizza Hut, Oracle, Starbucks and Dominos...
McRO case denied en banc rehearing
06 January 2017 | Washington DC | Reporter: Barney Dixon
Bandai Namco Games America has been denied an en banc rehearing in its cornerstone software patent case against McRO...
Nokia and Apple resume hostilities
23 December 2016 | California | Reporter: Mark Dugdale
Nokia has lodged complaints against Apple in the Regional Courts in Dusseldorf, Mannheim and Munich, Germany, as well as in the US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas...
Forum shopping decision could reduce patent lawsuits
16 December 2016 | Washington DC | Reporter: Barney Dixon
A US Supreme Court decision on forum shopping could lead to a reduction in patent lawsuits overall...