Washington DC
26 August 2016
Reporter: Mark Dugdale
Google wants Supreme Court to calm construction
Google has asked the US Supreme Court to weigh in on how the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit deals with patent claim construction.

The internet company filed a petition for review in mid-August, asking the Supreme Court to clarify that a patent’s entire prosecution history be used in claim construction.

Google and two inventors came to blows in 2013. They accused the internet company of infringing patents for malware protection software with the Chrome web browser.

In 2015, the Federal Circuit overturned the lower court’s ruling that Google hadn’t infringed the patent.

The appeals court used the inventors’ definition of “web browser process” and ignored the prosecution history, because it didn’t clearly disavow what they had claimed.

Google argued in its petition for review that the Federal Circuit both ignored correct practice and skewed analyses towards "overbroad and acontextual" constructions by failing to consider the prosecution history.

“First, the uncertainty over which claim-construction rules will apply in any given case deprives the public of reasonable certainty regarding patents’ scope,” Google explained.

“Second, the Federal Circuit’s clear- and-unmistakable standard artificially restricts the courts’ consideration of important contextual evidence by rendering prosecution history all but irrelevant in the mine run of cases, and thereby skews the analysis toward overbroad and acontextual constructions.”

“The resulting uncertainty and overbreadth harm the very innovation the Patent Act is supposed to encourage and protect.”

More Patents news
The latest news from IPPro The Internet
Join Our Newsletter

Sign up today and never
miss the latest news or an issue again

Subscribe now
Nokia and Apple settle new dispute
24 May 2017 | California | Reporter: Mark Dugdale
The settlement puts a stop to litigation that spanned the US and Germany and saw Apple claim in federal court that the Finnish company conspired with patent licensing companies to unlawfully extract royalties
Uber-Waymo dispute referred for criminal investigation
11 May 2017 | California | Reporter: Barney Dixon
Judge William Alsup said the evidence against Waymo was the strongest he’d seen in 42 years
AST launches IP3 2017
02 May 2017 | New Jersey | Reporter: Barney Dixon
The 2017 programme will target specific technologies, including the internet of things, content delivery systems and networking
WiLAN diversifies in wake of patent licensing challenges
20 April 2017 | Ottawa | Reporter: Mark Dugdale
WiLAN is acquiring an internet of things company for $47.4 million as it looks to diversify away from its core patent licensing business
Court tells bee trap maker to buzz off
27 March 2017 | Alabama | Reporter: Mark Dugdale
The US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama issued a summary judgement in favour of eBay on 20 March
Google must pay $20 million for Chrome infringement
15 February 2017 | Texas | Reporter: Barney Dixon
Google must pay $20 million in damages for infringement of four patents related to anti-malware
Trading tech patents upheld under Alice
19 January 2017 | Illinois | Reporter: Barney Dixon
Trading Technologies International’s electronic trading patents have been upheld under the Supreme Court’s decision in Alice v CLS Bank...