03 August 2016
Reporter: Barney Dixon
VirnetX's $625.6 million verdict against Apple voided
A US federal judge has voided a verdict ordering Apple to pay $625.6 million to VirnetX for infringing four patents.

Judge Robert Schroeder said in a decision on 29 July at the US District Court for the District of Eastern Texas that two lawsuits that had been combined into a single trial led to jurors being unknowingly influenced by a prior verdict.

The cases, referred to by VirnetX as Apple I and Apple II, will now be tried separately.

The cases had previously been combined after the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit had remanded Apple I and vacated the $368 million damages award VirnetX had won.

VirnetX said that the issues in Apple I were largely similar to the issues in Apple II and that all of these issues could be decided at the trial for the second case.

But this was ultimately unfair for Apple, Judge Schroeder ruled.

VirnetX was awarded the $625.6 million judgement earlier this year in the combined case and was confident in its victory, with Caldwell Cassidy, attorney at VirnetX, saying “Apple has been infringing VirnetX’s patented technology for years”.

Kendall Larsen, VirnetX's CEO and president, commented on 29 July: “We are disappointed by the court’s decision to vacate its prior ruling.”

“We are reviewing all our options ... we trust that the jury will again make the right decision in the retrials.”

Apple I, which covers the alleged infringement of VirnetX patents in Apple’s VPN-on-Demand, as well as alleged infringement in Apple’s FaceTime product, is scheduled for jury selection on 26 September, unless both parties agree to an alternative date.

Apple II, which covers similar alleged infringement by Apple’s redesigned VPN-on-Demand, FaceTime and iMessage services, will be retried after Apple I.

More Patents news
The latest news from IPPro The Internet
Join Our Newsletter

Sign up today and never
miss the latest news or an issue again

Subscribe now
Nokia and Apple settle new dispute
24 May 2017 | California | Reporter: Mark Dugdale
The settlement puts a stop to litigation that spanned the US and Germany and saw Apple claim in federal court that the Finnish company conspired with patent licensing companies to unlawfully extract royalties
Uber-Waymo dispute referred for criminal investigation
11 May 2017 | California | Reporter: Barney Dixon
Judge William Alsup said the evidence against Waymo was the strongest he’d seen in 42 years
AST launches IP3 2017
02 May 2017 | New Jersey | Reporter: Barney Dixon
The 2017 programme will target specific technologies, including the internet of things, content delivery systems and networking
WiLAN diversifies in wake of patent licensing challenges
20 April 2017 | Ottawa | Reporter: Mark Dugdale
WiLAN is acquiring an internet of things company for $47.4 million as it looks to diversify away from its core patent licensing business
Court tells bee trap maker to buzz off
27 March 2017 | Alabama | Reporter: Mark Dugdale
The US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama issued a summary judgement in favour of eBay on 20 March
Google must pay $20 million for Chrome infringement
15 February 2017 | Texas | Reporter: Barney Dixon
Google must pay $20 million in damages for infringement of four patents related to anti-malware
Trading tech patents upheld under Alice
19 January 2017 | Illinois | Reporter: Barney Dixon
Trading Technologies International’s electronic trading patents have been upheld under the Supreme Court’s decision in Alice v CLS Bank...