Texas
03 August 2016
Reporter: Barney Dixon
VirnetX's $625.6 million verdict against Apple voided
A US federal judge has voided a verdict ordering Apple to pay $625.6 million to VirnetX for infringing four patents.

Judge Robert Schroeder said in a decision on 29 July at the US District Court for the District of Eastern Texas that two lawsuits that had been combined into a single trial led to jurors being unknowingly influenced by a prior verdict.

The cases, referred to by VirnetX as Apple I and Apple II, will now be tried separately.

The cases had previously been combined after the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit had remanded Apple I and vacated the $368 million damages award VirnetX had won.

VirnetX said that the issues in Apple I were largely similar to the issues in Apple II and that all of these issues could be decided at the trial for the second case.

But this was ultimately unfair for Apple, Judge Schroeder ruled.

VirnetX was awarded the $625.6 million judgement earlier this year in the combined case and was confident in its victory, with Caldwell Cassidy, attorney at VirnetX, saying “Apple has been infringing VirnetX’s patented technology for years”.

Kendall Larsen, VirnetX's CEO and president, commented on 29 July: “We are disappointed by the court’s decision to vacate its prior ruling.”

“We are reviewing all our options ... we trust that the jury will again make the right decision in the retrials.”

Apple I, which covers the alleged infringement of VirnetX patents in Apple’s VPN-on-Demand, as well as alleged infringement in Apple’s FaceTime product, is scheduled for jury selection on 26 September, unless both parties agree to an alternative date.

Apple II, which covers similar alleged infringement by Apple’s redesigned VPN-on-Demand, FaceTime and iMessage services, will be retried after Apple I.

More Patents news
The latest news from IPPro The Internet
Join Our Newsletter

Sign up today and never
miss the latest news or an issue again

Subscribe now
Congressmen Issa and Goodlatte hit out at Judge Gilstrap
20 July 2017 | Washington DC | Reporter: Mark Dugdale
Two members of the House judiciary committee have criticised Judge Rodney Gilstrap for his interpretation of TC Heartland v Kraft Foods, going as far as to suggest that he is putting the needs of the Eastern District of Texas above serving justice
European Commission to investigate Qualcomm
13 June 2017 | Brussels | Reporter: Barney Dixon
Qualcomm is under investigation over competition concerns about its proposed acquisition of semiconductor rival NXP
Michelle Lee resigns as USPTO director
07 June 2017 | Washington DC | Reporter: Barney Dixon
Michelle Lee notified staff that she would be standing down from her post, but offered no reason for her sudden departure
Uber fires Levandowski
31 May 2017 | California | Reporter: Barney Dixon
Uber has fired key executive Anthony Levandowski after he failed to cooperate in a trade secret dispute with Alphabet’s Waymo
Nokia and Apple settle new dispute
24 May 2017 | California | Reporter: Mark Dugdale
The settlement puts a stop to litigation that spanned the US and Germany and saw Apple claim in federal court that the Finnish company conspired with patent licensing companies to unlawfully extract royalties
Uber-Waymo dispute referred for criminal investigation
11 May 2017 | California | Reporter: Barney Dixon
Judge William Alsup said the evidence against Waymo was the strongest he’d seen in 42 years
AST launches IP3 2017
02 May 2017 | New Jersey | Reporter: Barney Dixon
The 2017 programme will target specific technologies, including the internet of things, content delivery systems and networking