03 August 2016
Reporter: Barney Dixon
VirnetX's $625.6 million verdict against Apple voided
A US federal judge has voided a verdict ordering Apple to pay $625.6 million to VirnetX for infringing four patents.

Judge Robert Schroeder said in a decision on 29 July at the US District Court for the District of Eastern Texas that two lawsuits that had been combined into a single trial led to jurors being unknowingly influenced by a prior verdict.

The cases, referred to by VirnetX as Apple I and Apple II, will now be tried separately.

The cases had previously been combined after the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit had remanded Apple I and vacated the $368 million damages award VirnetX had won.

VirnetX said that the issues in Apple I were largely similar to the issues in Apple II and that all of these issues could be decided at the trial for the second case.

But this was ultimately unfair for Apple, Judge Schroeder ruled.

VirnetX was awarded the $625.6 million judgement earlier this year in the combined case and was confident in its victory, with Caldwell Cassidy, attorney at VirnetX, saying “Apple has been infringing VirnetX’s patented technology for years”.

Kendall Larsen, VirnetX's CEO and president, commented on 29 July: “We are disappointed by the court’s decision to vacate its prior ruling.”

“We are reviewing all our options ... we trust that the jury will again make the right decision in the retrials.”

Apple I, which covers the alleged infringement of VirnetX patents in Apple’s VPN-on-Demand, as well as alleged infringement in Apple’s FaceTime product, is scheduled for jury selection on 26 September, unless both parties agree to an alternative date.

Apple II, which covers similar alleged infringement by Apple’s redesigned VPN-on-Demand, FaceTime and iMessage services, will be retried after Apple I.

More Patents news
The latest news from IPPro The Internet
Join Our Newsletter

Sign up today and never
miss the latest news or an issue again

Subscribe now
Court tells bee trap maker to buzz off
27 March 2017 | Alabama | Reporter: Mark Dugdale
The US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama issued a summary judgement in favour of eBay on 20 March
Google must pay $20 million for Chrome infringement
15 February 2017 | Texas | Reporter: Barney Dixon
Google must pay $20 million in damages for infringement of four patents related to anti-malware
Trading tech patents upheld under Alice
19 January 2017 | Illinois | Reporter: Barney Dixon
Trading Technologies International’s electronic trading patents have been upheld under the Supreme Court’s decision in Alice v CLS Bank...
Ameranth to press on with mass infringement claims
16 January 2017 | California | Reporter: Barney Dixon
Internet solutions company Ameranth has been granted an order lifting the stay of more than 30 patent infringement cases, against defendants such as Pizza Hut, Oracle, Starbucks and Dominos...
McRO case denied en banc rehearing
06 January 2017 | Washington DC | Reporter: Barney Dixon
Bandai Namco Games America has been denied an en banc rehearing in its cornerstone software patent case against McRO...
Nokia and Apple resume hostilities
23 December 2016 | California | Reporter: Mark Dugdale
Nokia has lodged complaints against Apple in the Regional Courts in Dusseldorf, Mannheim and Munich, Germany, as well as in the US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas...
Forum shopping decision could reduce patent lawsuits
16 December 2016 | Washington DC | Reporter: Barney Dixon
A US Supreme Court decision on forum shopping could lead to a reduction in patent lawsuits overall...