Washington DC
01 June 2016
Reporter: Tammy Facey
Microsoft transfers patents to Xiaomi
Microsoft has agreed to transfer patents to electronics company Xiaomi in a deal that will see Office and Skype installed on its Android devices.

Under the agreement, Xiaomi’s Android products will employ Microsoft Office and Skype video-calling. The deal includes a cross-licence and the transfer of unnamed patents to the China-based company.

Further details were not disclosed.

In September, Xiaomi’s mobile devices, including the Mi 5, Mi Max and Redmi 3, will come pre-installed with Microsoft Office software, including Word, Excel, PowerPoint and Outlook, as well as Skype.

As a result of the collaboration, Xiaomi said in a statement, customers in China, India and around the world “will have new ways to work, collaborate and communicate.”

Xiang Wang, senior vice president at Xiaomi, said: “As demonstrated by this agreement with Microsoft, Xiaomi is looking to build sustainable, long-term partnerships with global technology leaders, with the ultimate goal of bringing the best user experience to our Mi fans.”

“People want their favourite apps and experiences to work seamlessly on the device of their choice, and that’s exactly what this partnership offers,” added Peggy Johnson, executive vice president of business development at Microsoft.

“Together with Xiaomi, we’re bringing the very best in mobile productivity to millions more customers in China and around the world.”

Microsoft is expanding its reach in Asia. Last week, the company signed a patent deal with Japan-based accessory manufacturer ELECOM.

The company has entered into more than 1,200 licensing agreements since the launch of its programme in December 2003, which reportedly brings in more than $3 billion in licensing fees per year.

Tristan Sherliker, associate solicitor at law firm EIP, said Xiaomi’s business focus is almost entirely on markets in the likes of China and Malaysia, but its agreement with Microsoft could help it reach other markets.

“This new patent pot from Microsoft might just be what Xiaomi needs to break in to the wider global market: now that it owns patented tech, as well as using it in its smartphones, Xiaomi is in a much better position to compete with rivals such as Apple and Samsung.”

More Patents news
The latest news from IPPro The Internet
Join Our Newsletter

Sign up today and never
miss the latest news or an issue again

Subscribe now
Google must pay $20 million for Chrome infringement
15 February 2017 | Texas | Reporter: Barney Dixon
Google must pay $20 million in damages for infringement of four patents related to anti-malware
Trading tech patents upheld under Alice
19 January 2017 | Illinois | Reporter: Barney Dixon
Trading Technologies International’s electronic trading patents have been upheld under the Supreme Court’s decision in Alice v CLS Bank...
Ameranth to press on with mass infringement claims
16 January 2017 | California | Reporter: Barney Dixon
Internet solutions company Ameranth has been granted an order lifting the stay of more than 30 patent infringement cases, against defendants such as Pizza Hut, Oracle, Starbucks and Dominos...
McRO case denied en banc rehearing
06 January 2017 | Washington DC | Reporter: Barney Dixon
Bandai Namco Games America has been denied an en banc rehearing in its cornerstone software patent case against McRO...
Nokia and Apple resume hostilities
23 December 2016 | California | Reporter: Mark Dugdale
Nokia has lodged complaints against Apple in the Regional Courts in Dusseldorf, Mannheim and Munich, Germany, as well as in the US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas...
Forum shopping decision could reduce patent lawsuits
16 December 2016 | Washington DC | Reporter: Barney Dixon
A US Supreme Court decision on forum shopping could lead to a reduction in patent lawsuits overall...
Supreme Court reverses Samsung v Apple
06 December 2016 | Washington DC | Reporter: Mark Dugdale
The US Supreme Court has reversed the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit’s decision in Samsung v Apple, finding its reading of “article of manufacture” to be too narrow...