Washington DC
17 November 2016
Reporter: Barney Dixon

Internet Association provides Trump with IP policy


More than 40 key players in internet business, including Google, Netflix, Amazon and Twitter, have delivered new US President-Elect Donald Trump a roadmap on intellectual property policy.

The Internet Association sent the roadmap in a letter addressed to Trump on 14 November, six days after his victory over presidential rival Hillary Clinton.

It requested that Trump uphold and support copyright safe harbours included in Section 512 of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, which it said provides “flexible yet robust parameters from which responsible internet companies can operate in good faith in order to grow and adapt across time and technical evolution”.

“The safe harbors are a system of legal certainty that remains the gold standard worldwide for fostering innovative online ecosystems beneficial to creators and service providers alike.”

Further, the association asked that Trump modernise the US Copyright Office to “meet the needs of diverse stakeholders and the public interest in the 21st century”.

This also falls in line with the association’s request for Trump to prevent the EU’s Digital Single Market proposals, including the highly controversial link-tax.

It said that if these proposals were to be implemented, they would “undermine the ability of our governments to stand united against more underhanded efforts elsewhere in the world.”

Finally, the Internet Association said that the US should support balanced IP provisions in future trade agreements and foreign diplomacy.

“Innovative internet companies, as well as the US small businesses that use internet services to reach global customers, require balanced copyright rules in other regions in order to do businesses in those markets.”

“These services increasingly face barriers to entry in countries that lack adequate intellectual property regimes. The internet sector strongly believes copyright policy in trade agreements must reflect and promote the balanced framework in US law, which provides not only strong protections and enforcement, but also robust and flexible limitations and exceptions, including fair use and copyright safe harbors.”

More Industry news
The latest news from IPPro The Internet
Join Our Newsletter

Sign up today and never
miss the latest news or an issue again

Subscribe now
US formally institutes China IP investigation
21 August 2017 | Washington DC | Reporter: Barney Dixon
A Section 301 investigation into intellectual property malpractice in China championed by US President Donald Trump has formally launched
CIPU enters education partnership
21 August 2017 | New York | Reporter: Barney Dixon
The Center for Intellectual Property Understanding and the Michelson 20MM Foundation are partnering to improve awareness of intellectual property rights
Trump fires forward in China IP investigation
15 August 2017 | Washington DC | Reporter: Barney Dixon
US President Donald Trump has signed a memorandum asking the US Trade Representative to examine whether China should be investigated for alleged intellectual property malpractice
Trump to give green light for China IP investigation
14 August 2017 | Washington DC | Reporter: Barney Dixon
US President Donald Trump is to sign an executive memorandum authorising the US Trade Representative to examine China’s allegedly “unfair” intellectual property practices
Incopro forges partnership with Canadian firm
31 July 2017 | London | Reporter: Barney Dixon
Canadian law firm McCarthy Tétrault is the latest firm to partner with brand protection specialist Incopro
Google to challenge delisting order in the US
28 July 2017 | California | Reporter: Barney Dixon
Google has filed a First Amendment complaint in the US, challenging a Canadian Supreme Court ruling that has forced Google to remove a website from its search results worldwide
EFF seeks default judgement on defamation case
27 July 2017 | California | Reporter: Barney Dixon
Global Equity Management missed the deadline to respond to the EFF’s lawsuit in the Northern District of California over a Stupid Patent of the Month blog post