Washington DC
08 May 2017
Reporter: Barney Dixon
US suggests Dancing Baby case be put to bed
The acting US solicitor general has advised the US Supreme Court to deny the closely watched ‘Dancing Baby’ copyright infringement case.

Last week (4 May), acting US solicitor general Jeffrey Wall argued: “Even if a question concerning the mental state required for DMCA liability otherwise warranted this court’s review, this case would not be an appropriate vehicle in which to consider it.”

The Supreme Court invited the solicitor general to file a brief expressing the views of the US in October last year, after multiple interested parties weighed in with their own opinions. The case focuses on Stephanie Lenz, the creator of the 29 second ‘Dancing Baby’ YouTube video, which featured her toddler son dancing to Prince’s Let’s Go Crazy.

Universal Music Group (UMG) sent a notice to YouTube claiming that Lenz had committed copyright infringement under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA). The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) took the case on behalf of Lenz and sued UMG for improper use of the DMCA.

In 2015, the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit sided with Lenz, ruling that the video fell under the fair use exemption of the DMCA, but said that UMG, along with other senders of false infringement notices, could be excused as long as they subjectively believed the material they targeted was infringing.

The EFF petitioned the Supreme Court to “ensure that copyright holders who make unreasonable infringement claims can be held accountable if those claims force lawful speech offline”.

Wall did say that the Ninth Circuit correctly interpreted Section 512(f) of the DMCA to require actual knowledge or willful blindness.

Section 512(f) provides that any person who misrepresents that material under the DMCA should be liable for damages.

But Wall added that the Ninth Circuit had “erroneously focused on the falsity of the copyright owner’s statement of good-faith belief, rather than on the falsity of its allegation of infringement”.

According to Wall, the Ninth Circuit’s analysis suggested that a copyright owner that sends a takedown notice without first conducting a fair use inquiry, “may be held liable for that omission alone, whether or not the challenged material is actually infringing”.

“That approach cannot be reconciled with the text of Section 512(f), which imposes liability on a copyright owner who ‘knowingly materially misrepresents’ that the challenged ‘material or activity is infringing’.”

More Copyright news
The latest news from IPPro The Internet
Join Our Newsletter

Sign up today and never
miss the latest news or an issue again

Subscribe now
Elsevier wins $15 million settlement
26 June 2017 | New York | Reporter: Barney Dixon
Elsevier has received $15 million in damages in its copyright infringement lawsuit against Sci-Hub, the Library Genesis project and a number of other sites
Trio sentenced over piracy business
26 June 2017 | London | Reporter: Barney Dixon
Three men have received suspended prison sentences for illegally distributing copyrighted content, costing more than £2.5 million
Dancing Baby will be neither seen nor heard
21 June 2017 | Washington DC | Reporter: Barney Dixon
The US Supreme Court has denied certiorari in the infamous ‘Dancing Baby’ copyright infringement case
Deadpool uploader arrested
20 June 2017 | Los Angeles | Reporter: Mark Dugdale
A man in California has been arrested on charges of criminal copyright infringement for allegedly uploading a copy of the Deadpool movie to Facebook
Netflix, Amazon and Disney help launch anti-piracy coalition
19 June 2017 | New York | Reporter: Barney Dixon
Netflix, Amazon and Disney are among 30 companies involved in the launch of the Alliance for Creativity and Entertainment
Operation Creative causes 87 percent drop in infringing ad revenue
15 June 2017 | London | Reporter: Barney Dixon
The operation gives gambling operators access to an up-to-date list of copyright infringing sites through PIPCU’s Infringing Websites List
CJEU confirms The Pirate Bay does communicate to the public
15 June 2017 | Luxembourg | Reporter: Mark Dugdale
The Pirate Bay, as a P2P network that indexes infringing content, is engaging in communications to the public under the Copyright Directive