California
23 March 2017
Reporter: Barney Dixon

FilmOn X fails to get judicial support


The US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit has dismissed online service FilmOn X’s attempt to obtain a compulsory licence to the works it retransmits, finding it unable to be regarded as a ‘cable provider’ under the Copyright Act.

In another win for TV networks against retransmission technology, the Ninth Circuit rejected FilmOn’s claims that it still met the definition of a cable system despite transmitting over the internet, in its 21 March decision.

FilmOn had sought protection under Section 111 of the Copyright Act, which allows cable providers to retransmit “a performance or display of a work” that had been originally broadcast by someone else, so long as it pays a statutory fee to the Copyright Office.

But the Ninth Circuit said that when Section 111 was enacted in 1976, the cable industry “was a fledgling one”.

Congress responded to “economic conditions by enacting Section 111, which relieved cable systems of the need to sit down with every copyright holder before retransmitting their copyrighted broadcast works”.

“One could reasonably conclude that extending Section 111 to internet-based retransmission services would not further, and might in fact jeopardise” the values with which it was designed for,” the Ninth Circuit said.

FilmOn’s case follows the Supreme Court’s decision against online TV service Aereo in 2014.

The Supreme Court ultimately said that Aereo violated the public performance provision of the Copyright Act, which put an end to the online TV service and its use of arrays of thousands of tiny antennas to capture over-the-air transmissions.

More Copyright news
The latest news from IPPro The Internet
Join Our Newsletter

Sign up today and never
miss the latest news or an issue again

Subscribe now
Netflix, Fox and Amazon sue TickBox IPTV box
18 October 2017 | California | Reporter: Barney Dixon
Netflix, Fox and Universal are among seven entertainment companies joining together to sue Android TV streaming box, TickBox TV, for copyright infringement
Article 13 of DSM proposals should be deleted, says the EFF
17 October 2017 | Brussels | Reporter: Barney Dixon
Digital advocacy group the EFF and other civil society organisations that have penned a letter to European lawmakers demanding that Article 13 of the EU’s new copyright reforms is deleted
Pirate ad revenues halved by anti-piracy efforts
10 October 2017 | Washington DC | Reporter: Barney Dixon
Pirate advert revenues have been halved by anti-piracy efforts, according to a study from the Trustworthy Accountability Group
Rightscorp signs China anti-piracy agreement
09 October 2017 | California | Reporter: Barney Dixon
Rightscorp has signed an agreement with Chinese businessman Vincent Yen on behalf of a “major Chinese media company” to monitor online copyright infringement
Google not liable for image search thumbnails
04 October 2017 | Hamburg | Reporter: Barney Dixon
Google’s image search does not exploit copyright by showing thumbnails of copyright infringing images, the German Federal Court of Justice has ruled
EFF chimes in on Kodi debate
02 October 2017 | San Francisco | Reporter: Barney Dixon
Legal action against Kodi IPTV box add-on manufacturers are an attempt to expand the scope of secondary copyright infringement, and smear and discourage open source, freely configurable media players
BREIN secures temporary Pirate Bay blocking order
27 September 2017 | The Hague | Reporter: Barney Dixon
Dutch anti-piracy group BREIN has secured a ruling that will force internet service providers (ISPs) Ziggo and XS4ALL to temporarily block access to The Pirate Bay