Luxembourg
01 March 2017
Reporter: Barney Dixon
Cut out retransmissions, no exceptions
A UK exception to copyright that was intended to broaden access to TV broadcasts cannot be applied to retransmissions over the internet because it contravenes EU law, according to the Court of Justice of the EU (CJEU).

The CJEU responded today (1 March) to the UK Court of Appeal’s request for a preliminary ruling, stating that Article 9 of the Copyright Directive bars application of the national exception.

The dispute centres on streaming website TVCatchup and UK TV broadcasters ITV, Channel 4 and Channel 5, whose copyrighted transmissions were picked up and retransmitted over the internet.

The CJEU confirmed in March 2013 in response to a previous request for a preliminary ruling from the UK Court of Appeal that the retransmission of satellite broadcasts via the internet without the copyright holder’s consent constitutes an unlawful communication to the public under Article 3 of the Copyright Directive.

But a question remained as to whether TVCatchup could defend itself under Section 73 of the UK’s Copyright, Designs and Patents Act.

Section 73 of the UK’s Copyright, Designs and Patents Act says that copyright in a broadcast is not infringed if the wireless broadcast is made from a place in the UK and immediately transmitted by cable, so long as the broadcast is made for reception in the area in which it is retransmitted by cable and forms part of a qualifying service.

It also says the copyright is not infringed if the broadcast is made for reception in the area in which it is retransmitted by cable.

In his opinion, delivered in September 2016, CJEU advocate general Henrik Saugmandsgaard Øe argued that Section 73 was an attempt to make an exception to Article 3 of the EU Copyright Directive’s exclusive right of communication to the public, “in that it provides that the copyright ‘is not infringed’ where certain broadcast works are retransmitted in the area for which they were intended”.

This contravenes Article 9 of the same directive, according to Øe.

Øe said: “The objectives pursued by Section 73 of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act—namely, according to the UK government, to increase consumer choice for public service broadcasting, by allowing consumers to receive such broadcasts in areas suffering from poor terrestrial television reception, and to encourage cable network operators to lay cable infrastructure—cannot have the slightest impact on the interpretation of the scope of Article 9 of EU Copyright Directive,” Øe added.

Agreeing with Øe, the CJEU ruled: “An interpretation of Article 9 to the effect that it permits a retransmission, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, without the consent of the authors, in cases other than those provided for in Article 5 of that directive, would run counter not only to the objective of Article 9, but also to the exhaustive nature of Article 5, and, consequently, would be detrimental to the achievement of the principal objective of that directive which is to establish a high level of protection of authors.”

Therefore, “Article 9 of Copyright Directive must be interpreted as not covering, and not permitting, national legislation which provides that copyright is not infringed in the case of the immediate retransmission by cable.”

The UK’s Digital Economy Bill, which is currently making its way through the legislature, contains a proposal to repeal Section 73.

More Copyright news
The latest news from IPPro The Internet
Join Our Newsletter

Sign up today and never
miss the latest news or an issue again

Subscribe now
Elsevier wins $15 million settlement
26 June 2017 | New York | Reporter: Barney Dixon
Elsevier has received $15 million in damages in its copyright infringement lawsuit against Sci-Hub, the Library Genesis project and a number of other sites
Trio sentenced over piracy business
26 June 2017 | London | Reporter: Barney Dixon
Three men have received suspended prison sentences for illegally distributing copyrighted content, costing more than £2.5 million
Dancing Baby will be neither seen nor heard
21 June 2017 | Washington DC | Reporter: Barney Dixon
The US Supreme Court has denied certiorari in the infamous ‘Dancing Baby’ copyright infringement case
Deadpool uploader arrested
20 June 2017 | Los Angeles | Reporter: Mark Dugdale
A man in California has been arrested on charges of criminal copyright infringement for allegedly uploading a copy of the Deadpool movie to Facebook
Netflix, Amazon and Disney help launch anti-piracy coalition
19 June 2017 | New York | Reporter: Barney Dixon
Netflix, Amazon and Disney are among 30 companies involved in the launch of the Alliance for Creativity and Entertainment
Operation Creative causes 87 percent drop in infringing ad revenue
15 June 2017 | London | Reporter: Barney Dixon
The operation gives gambling operators access to an up-to-date list of copyright infringing sites through PIPCU’s Infringing Websites List
CJEU confirms The Pirate Bay does communicate to the public
15 June 2017 | Luxembourg | Reporter: Mark Dugdale
The Pirate Bay, as a P2P network that indexes infringing content, is engaging in communications to the public under the Copyright Directive