Luxembourg
01 March 2017
Reporter: Barney Dixon

Cut out retransmissions, no exceptions


A UK exception to copyright that was intended to broaden access to TV broadcasts cannot be applied to retransmissions over the internet because it contravenes EU law, according to the Court of Justice of the EU (CJEU).

The CJEU responded today (1 March) to the UK Court of Appeal’s request for a preliminary ruling, stating that Article 9 of the Copyright Directive bars application of the national exception.

The dispute centres on streaming website TVCatchup and UK TV broadcasters ITV, Channel 4 and Channel 5, whose copyrighted transmissions were picked up and retransmitted over the internet.

The CJEU confirmed in March 2013 in response to a previous request for a preliminary ruling from the UK Court of Appeal that the retransmission of satellite broadcasts via the internet without the copyright holder’s consent constitutes an unlawful communication to the public under Article 3 of the Copyright Directive.

But a question remained as to whether TVCatchup could defend itself under Section 73 of the UK’s Copyright, Designs and Patents Act.

Section 73 of the UK’s Copyright, Designs and Patents Act says that copyright in a broadcast is not infringed if the wireless broadcast is made from a place in the UK and immediately transmitted by cable, so long as the broadcast is made for reception in the area in which it is retransmitted by cable and forms part of a qualifying service.

It also says the copyright is not infringed if the broadcast is made for reception in the area in which it is retransmitted by cable.

In his opinion, delivered in September 2016, CJEU advocate general Henrik Saugmandsgaard Øe argued that Section 73 was an attempt to make an exception to Article 3 of the EU Copyright Directive’s exclusive right of communication to the public, “in that it provides that the copyright ‘is not infringed’ where certain broadcast works are retransmitted in the area for which they were intended”.

This contravenes Article 9 of the same directive, according to Øe.

Øe said: “The objectives pursued by Section 73 of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act—namely, according to the UK government, to increase consumer choice for public service broadcasting, by allowing consumers to receive such broadcasts in areas suffering from poor terrestrial television reception, and to encourage cable network operators to lay cable infrastructure—cannot have the slightest impact on the interpretation of the scope of Article 9 of EU Copyright Directive,” Øe added.

Agreeing with Øe, the CJEU ruled: “An interpretation of Article 9 to the effect that it permits a retransmission, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, without the consent of the authors, in cases other than those provided for in Article 5 of that directive, would run counter not only to the objective of Article 9, but also to the exhaustive nature of Article 5, and, consequently, would be detrimental to the achievement of the principal objective of that directive which is to establish a high level of protection of authors.”

Therefore, “Article 9 of Copyright Directive must be interpreted as not covering, and not permitting, national legislation which provides that copyright is not infringed in the case of the immediate retransmission by cable.”

The UK’s Digital Economy Bill, which is currently making its way through the legislature, contains a proposal to repeal Section 73.

More Copyright news
The latest news from IPPro The Internet
Join Our Newsletter

Sign up today and never
miss the latest news or an issue again

Subscribe now
Netflix, Fox and Amazon sue TickBox IPTV box
18 October 2017 | California | Reporter: Barney Dixon
Netflix, Fox and Universal are among seven entertainment companies joining together to sue Android TV streaming box, TickBox TV, for copyright infringement
Article 13 of DSM proposals should be deleted, says the EFF
17 October 2017 | Brussels | Reporter: Barney Dixon
Digital advocacy group the EFF and other civil society organisations that have penned a letter to European lawmakers demanding that Article 13 of the EU’s new copyright reforms is deleted
Pirate ad revenues halved by anti-piracy efforts
10 October 2017 | Washington DC | Reporter: Barney Dixon
Pirate advert revenues have been halved by anti-piracy efforts, according to a study from the Trustworthy Accountability Group
Rightscorp signs China anti-piracy agreement
09 October 2017 | California | Reporter: Barney Dixon
Rightscorp has signed an agreement with Chinese businessman Vincent Yen on behalf of a “major Chinese media company” to monitor online copyright infringement
Google not liable for image search thumbnails
04 October 2017 | Hamburg | Reporter: Barney Dixon
Google’s image search does not exploit copyright by showing thumbnails of copyright infringing images, the German Federal Court of Justice has ruled
EFF chimes in on Kodi debate
02 October 2017 | San Francisco | Reporter: Barney Dixon
Legal action against Kodi IPTV box add-on manufacturers are an attempt to expand the scope of secondary copyright infringement, and smear and discourage open source, freely configurable media players
BREIN secures temporary Pirate Bay blocking order
27 September 2017 | The Hague | Reporter: Barney Dixon
Dutch anti-piracy group BREIN has secured a ruling that will force internet service providers (ISPs) Ziggo and XS4ALL to temporarily block access to The Pirate Bay