Washington DC
14 February 2017
Reporter: Barney Dixon
Oracle revives Google case
Oracle has revived its long running copyright dispute with Google over its Java application interfaces (APIs).

The company has once again taken the search engine to the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, this time to appeal against last year’s jury finding Google’s use of 37 Java APIs constituted fair use.

Google has reaped “billions of dollars while leaving Oracle’s Java business in tatters”, according to its opening brief.

In 2010, Oracle acquired Sun Microsystems and the rights to the Java programming language for $7 billion.

It then promptly sued Google, which, according to Oracle’s general counsel, Dorian Daley, developed its Android operating system by “illegally copying core Java technology to rush into the mobile device market”.

Last year, the jury concluded that Google’s use of the APIs constituted “fair use”.

But Oracle said in its brief that the jury reached the wrong result because “the district court repeatedly undermined Oracle’s case, often directly contrary to [the Federal Circuit’s] prior opinion”.

“The court sua sponte reinforced Google’s theme that Android was limited to the smartphone market where Java supposedly did not compete—and eliminated one of Oracle’s central arguments—by precluding Oracle from showing all the markets where Android and Java overlapped.”

Oracle said that Google knew that this was false, but soon after the decision, it announced Android for PCs.

“Google was secretly planning the launch for months, but Google explicitly—and falsely—denied any such plan in written discovery responses.”

“Nevertheless, when the truth emerged, the district court declined to vacate the verdict.”

Google has yet to file its response.

More Copyright news
The latest news from IPPro The Internet
Join Our Newsletter

Sign up today and never
miss the latest news or an issue again

Subscribe now
Safe harbour reforms dropped from Australian bill
24 March 2017 | Canberra | Reporter: Barney Dixon
The reforms may have delayed passage of other important provisions
FilmOn X fails to get judicial support
23 March 2017 | California | Reporter: Barney Dixon
Classing the service as a ‘cable provider’ could “jeopardise” the values of the Copyright Act
Supreme Court rules in Star Athletica v Varsity Brands
23 March 2017 | Washington DC | Reporter: Barney Dixon
Ruling heralded as a “big step forward for clothing designers”
CJCH to spearhead government-backed anti-piracy HQ
22 March 2017 | Cardiff | Reporter: Barney Dixon
CJCH Solicitors is backed by £432,000 from the Welsh government
Brazil floats new copyright rules under WTO
21 March 2017 | Brasília | Reporter: Barney Dixon
The new proposals were circulated in a paper on electronic commerce and copyright
BREIN launches Usenet appeal
20 March 2017 | Amsterdam | Reporter: Barney Dixon
Dutch anti-piracy group BREIN is taking its battle against Usenet provider News Service Europe (NSE) to the Supreme Court of the Netherlands
Premier League granted live-blocking order
20 March 2017 | London | Reporter: Barney Dixon
The English Premier League has been granted a live-blocking order against the UK’s biggest ISPs