Massachusetts
13 February 2017
Reporter: Barney Dixon

EFF slams proposals for UDRP-style copyright infringement system


The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) has slammed the Domain Name Association’s (DNA) proposal for a third-party copyright infringement system, calling it “ill-conceived” and “the very epitome of shadow regulation”.

According to the DNA, the voluntary system works in a similar way to the UDRP for trademarks.

DNA’s proposal came as part of its Healthy Domains Initiative, which aims to encourage “sound stewardship of the internet namespace” through consultations with various industry players, including law enforcement authorities and content providers.

The other proposals included addressing online security abuse, enhancing child abuse mitigation systems and streamlining complaint handling from illegal or ‘rogue’ online pharmacies.

But the EFF warned: “Any voluntary, private dispute resolution system paid for by the complaining parties will be captured by copyright holders and become a privatised version of the failed internet censorship bills SOPA and PIPA.”

“The Healthy Domains Initiative proposal was written by a group of domain name companies. They include Donuts.”

“Donuts has taken many steps that serve the interests of major corporate trademark and copyright holders over those of other internet users.”

“These include a private agreement with the Motion Picture Association of America to suspend domain names on request based on accusations of copyright infringement, and a ‘Domain Protected Marks List Plus’ that gives brand owners the power to stop others from using common words and phrases in domain names—a degree of control that they don't get from either ICANN procedures or trademark law.”

Mason Cole, vice president at Donuts and chair of the Healthy Domains Initiative committee, said that the proposal would address “pervasive and systemic copyright infringement”.

According to the Healthy Domains Initiative committee, the system’s “legal construct must be sound”. It must accurately reflect applicable law, be flexible in the face of copyright laws varying among jurisdictions, ensure due process for respondents and that complaintants pay panel fees, and not allow registries or registrars to be named as parties.

More Copyright news
The latest news from IPPro The Internet
Join Our Newsletter

Sign up today and never
miss the latest news or an issue again

Subscribe now
Sci-Hub holds more than two thirds of all scholarly articles
16 August 2017 | | Reporter: Barney Dixon
Academic pirate website, Sci-Hub contains nearly 69 percent of all 81.6 million scholarly articles, which rises to 85 percent for those published in closed access journals
Take-Two scores slam dunk in NBA case
14 August 2017 | New York | Reporter: Barney Dixon
The maker of the NBA 2K video game series, Take-Two, has won the dismissal of statutory damages of as much as $150,000 per copyright infringement in its legal battle with Solid Oak Sketches
ImageRights acquires Image Witness
11 August 2017 | Boston | Reporter: Barney Dixon
ImageRights said the acquisition will bolster its “technology leadership position in the fast-growing copyright enforcement services industry”
Binded announces US Copyright Office integration
09 August 2017 | San Francisco | Reporter: Barney Dixon
Blockchain-based copyright protection startup Binded has introduced one click-registration with the US Copyright Office
US right to indict KickAss Torrents founder
08 August 2017 | Illinois | Reporter: Barney Dixon
The US government was right to indict Artem Vaulin, the founder of peer-to-peer file sharing site KickAss Torrents, a US judge has ruled
South African copyright changes draw criticism
07 August 2017 | Cape Town | Reporter: Barney Dixon
The South African Copyright Amendment Bill has faced major criticism in the build up to its implementation, with several content creators coming out against many of its provisions
Photographer could get monkey off his back
07 August 2017 | San Francisco | Reporter: Barney Dixon
The ‘monkey selfie’ lawsuit could be settling down, after a motion to stay the appeal was filed by both parties