Brussels
30 November 2017
Reporter: Barney Dixon

INTA reveals Brexit position


The International Trademark Association (INTA) has revealed its position on Brexit, outlining five core principles that should be supported, promoted and safeguarded when the UK leaves the EU.

INTA said it recognised the need to “further advocate for strong intellectual property protection and harmonisation as Brexit negotiations unfold”.

The five core principles are the minimum disruption of trade; minimum costs; maximum retention of rights; maximum transparency and legal clarity; and a transitional period to acclimatise to any new rules.

In its position paper, INTA explained that it supports scenarios “that are expected to cause the least amount of disruption to trademark owners”.

It outlined two scenarios for existing EU trademarks (EUTMs) that it supports: the automatic extension of EUTMs to the UK as national trademarks, or the extension upon action by the EUTM owners of the EUTMs into national UK trademarks, provided that EUTM owner's express their intention to secure national UK trademarks.

INTA stated that in both scenarios, registered trademark owners should not be required to pay additional fees.

In a statement, INTA CEO, Etienne Sanz de Acedo, commented: “IP-intensive industries contribute significantly to employment and GDP in the EU and UK.”

“While we recognise that the Brexit process is complex, it is vital to strive for the least amount of disruption to trademark owners, and to carefully consider IP protection given its impact on businesses, consumers, employees, and the economies in these countries.”

He said: “The paper also aligns strongly with INTA’s approach to advocacy by providing pragmatic solutions and offering our continued participation in consultations and user meetings conducted by the EU and UK.”

INTA’s position paper echoes the positions of both the European Commission and the Chartered Institute of Trademark Attorneys on Brexit.

All three have requested that IP rights with unitary character remain enforceable in the UK.

More news
The latest news from IPPro The Internet
Join Our Newsletter

Sign up today and never
miss the latest news or an issue again

Subscribe now
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton promotes four to partner
16 February 2018 | California | Reporter: Barney Dixon
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton has promoted four intellectual property attorneys to partner across its Shanghai, San Diego and San Francisco offices
Man fined more than £500,000 for counterfeit selling
16 February 2018 | Stafford | Reporter: Barney Dixon
A man who bought counterfeit DVDs from China and sold them as genuine products on eBay has been fined £567,000 following 16 months of imprisonment
Memery Crystal hires IP and gambling partner
15 February 2018 | London | Reporter: Barney Dixon
Memery Crystal has hired Carl Rohsler as partner in its London office
Kemp Little hires IP partner
14 February 2018 | London | Reporter: Barney Dixon
Kemp Little has hired Rachael Barber as partner in its intellectual property practice
IPTV supplier fined £18,000
14 February 2018 | Harrow | Reporter: Barney Dixon
A pre-loaded IPTV box supplier must pay a £18,000 fine for selling illicit streaming devices online, as well as breaching the Premier League’s copyright
EIP hires trademark head
13 February 2018 | London | Reporter: Barney Dixon
Intellectual property law firm EIP has hired Claire Lehr as head of its trademark practice
Trio of Australian firms combine
12 February 2018 | Sydney | Reporter: Barney Dixon
Australian intellectual property law firms Fisher Adams Kelly Callinans, Cullens and Spruson & Ferguson will merge under the Spruson & Ferguson brand as of April 2018