California
11 May 2017
Reporter: Barney Dixon
Uber-Waymo dispute referred for criminal investigation
The trade secret dispute between Uber and Alphabet subsidiary Waymo has been recommended for a criminal investigation.

District Judge William Alsup, hearing the litigation in the US District Court of the Northern District of California after Waymo accused Uber of trade secret theft and unfair competition, referred the case to for prosecution on 11 May and denied Uber’s motion to compel arbitration.

Judge Alsup said that the strength of evidence against Anthony Levandowksi, whose company Otto was bought by Uber in August 2016, was the strongest he’d seen in 42 years. In his recommendation for a criminal investigation, Judge Alsup said “the court takes no position on whether a prosecution is or is not warranted”.

When Uber bought Otto, it appointed Levandowksi, who previously worked at Waymo, as its head of self-driving technology.

Otto’s LiDAR sensor technology was one of the key reasons Uber acquired the company, according to Waymo.

But Waymo claimed that it owns the LiDAR technology and that, six weeks before his resignation, Levandowksi downloaded more than 14,000 highly confidential and proprietary design files for various hardware systems, including LiDAR.

Levandowski has invoked his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination and refused to answer questions about the case.

Judge Alsup addressed this: “Levandowski’s assertion of his Fifth Amendment privilege has obstructed and continues to obstruct both discovery and defendants’ ability to construct a complete narrative as to the fate of Waymo’s purloined files.”

With regards to the arbitration, Alsup said that Uber had attempted to “steer this case into arbitration even though they have no agreement with anyone to arbitrate the case”.

“Instead, they rely on a non-party’s employment agreements with the plaintiff, which contained an arbitration clause, and attempt to invoke ‘equitable estoppel’.”

The judge also granted Waymo a preliminary injunction against Uber, although information as to its effect has been kept confidential.

More news
The latest news from IPPro The Internet
Join Our Newsletter

Sign up today and never
miss the latest news or an issue again

Subscribe now
Google hit with €2.42 billion EU antitrust fine
27 June 2017 | Brussels | Reporter: Barney Dixon
The European Commission ruled the company had abused its power by giving an advantage to its own products and services in Google search results
Elsevier wins $15 million settlement
26 June 2017 | New York | Reporter: Barney Dixon
Elsevier has received $15 million in damages in its copyright infringement lawsuit against Sci-Hub, the Library Genesis project and a number of other sites
Trio sentenced over piracy business
26 June 2017 | London | Reporter: Barney Dixon
Three men have received suspended prison sentences for illegally distributing copyrighted content, costing more than £2.5 million
Jones Day bolsters IP practice
26 June 2017 | Los Angeles | Reporter: Barney Dixon
Law firm Jones Day has added Andrea Jeffries and Emily Tait as partners to its intellectual property practice
Hong Kong, Albania and Panama among key counterfeit transit points
23 June 2017 | Alicante | Reporter: Barney Dixon
Hong Kong, Albania and Panama are among several key transit points for counterfeits worldwide
Merchant & Gould hires patent trio
22 June 2017 | New York | Reporter: Barney Dixon
Merchant & Gould has expanded its New York office with the addition of three new intellectual property attorneys.
Nominet releases annual .uk domain disputes report
22 June 2017 | London | Reporter: Barney Dixon
Over half of .uk domain disputes through Nominet’s Dispute Resolution Service have resulted in a domain name being transferred, saving an estimated £7.18 million in legal costs in 2016