Washington DC
08 May 2017
Reporter: Barney Dixon

US suggests Dancing Baby case be put to bed


The acting US solicitor general has advised the US Supreme Court to deny the closely watched ‘Dancing Baby’ copyright infringement case.

Last week (4 May), acting US solicitor general Jeffrey Wall argued: “Even if a question concerning the mental state required for DMCA liability otherwise warranted this court’s review, this case would not be an appropriate vehicle in which to consider it.”

The Supreme Court invited the solicitor general to file a brief expressing the views of the US in October last year, after multiple interested parties weighed in with their own opinions. The case focuses on Stephanie Lenz, the creator of the 29 second ‘Dancing Baby’ YouTube video, which featured her toddler son dancing to Prince’s Let’s Go Crazy.

Universal Music Group (UMG) sent a notice to YouTube claiming that Lenz had committed copyright infringement under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA). The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) took the case on behalf of Lenz and sued UMG for improper use of the DMCA.

In 2015, the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit sided with Lenz, ruling that the video fell under the fair use exemption of the DMCA, but said that UMG, along with other senders of false infringement notices, could be excused as long as they subjectively believed the material they targeted was infringing.

The EFF petitioned the Supreme Court to “ensure that copyright holders who make unreasonable infringement claims can be held accountable if those claims force lawful speech offline”.

Wall did say that the Ninth Circuit correctly interpreted Section 512(f) of the DMCA to require actual knowledge or willful blindness.

Section 512(f) provides that any person who misrepresents that material under the DMCA should be liable for damages.

But Wall added that the Ninth Circuit had “erroneously focused on the falsity of the copyright owner’s statement of good-faith belief, rather than on the falsity of its allegation of infringement”.

According to Wall, the Ninth Circuit’s analysis suggested that a copyright owner that sends a takedown notice without first conducting a fair use inquiry, “may be held liable for that omission alone, whether or not the challenged material is actually infringing”.

“That approach cannot be reconciled with the text of Section 512(f), which imposes liability on a copyright owner who ‘knowingly materially misrepresents’ that the challenged ‘material or activity is infringing’.”

More news
The latest news from IPPro The Internet
Join Our Newsletter

Sign up today and never
miss the latest news or an issue again

Subscribe now
Quarles & Brady hires internet of things expert
12 December 2017 | Milwaukee | Reporter: Barney Dixon
Quarles & Brady has hired Linda Emery as partner in its intellectual property practice group based in Milwaukee
Siemens reclaims infringing domains
11 December 2017 | Geneva | Reporter: Barney Dixon
Siemens has been transferred seven infringing domain names following a World Intellectual Property Organisation Arbitration and Mediation Centre dispute
PSNI, HMRC and FACT seize 50 illegal streaming devices
08 December 2017 | Belfast | Reporter: Barney Dixon
A joint operation between UK enforcement bodies has resulted in the seizure of 50 illegal streaming devices
China world’s top trademark filer in 2016
07 December 2017 | Geneva | Reporter: Barney Dixon
China was the world’s top trademark filer in 2016, with the country accounting for 3.7 million applications out of an estimated global total of 7 million
Marlboro beats infringer in UDRP dispute
07 December 2017 | Geneva | Reporter: Barney Dixon
Marlboro has acquired seven infringing domain names in a dispute at the World Intellectual Property Organisation Arbitration and Mediation Centre.
Squire Patton Boggs hires ex Walgreens Boots Alliance counsel
06 December 2017 | London | Reporter: Barney Dixon
Squire Patton Boggs has appointed Kerry Lee as partner in its intellectual property and technology practice
Google wins UDRP dispute
06 December 2017 | Minneapolis | Reporter: Barney Dixon
Google has won a domain dispute at the Alternative Dispute Resolution Forum