Los Angeles
17 March 2017
Reporter: Barney Dixon
TMCH could ‘interfere’ with free expression
Academics and practitioners have penned a letter to top Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) officials, expressing concerns about its Trademark Clearinghouse.

The 21 signatories to the letter asked Philip Corwin, Scott Evans and Kathy Kleiman, co-chairs of ICANN’s generic names supporting organisation, which is reviewing rights protection mechanisms, to look into a “troubling tendency” to disregard the “delicate balance that domestic trademark law strikes between the business interests of trademark owners and the free expression rights of their competitors and the general public”.

They outlined problems with the lack of transparency related to the Trademark Clearinghouse database. With the clearinghouse exercising a “quasi-public” function, the group said that the public should be able to search its database.

“In the digital age, the concealment of these records is a momentous and unjustifiable retreat from transparency.”

The group, which includes a professor from the Stanford Center for Internet and Society, as well as staff and attorneys from the Electronic Frontier Foundation, also said that sunrise periods go “beyond the rights that domestic trademark law recognises”.

“Under US and most other countries’ trademark laws, ordinarily a trademark right only exists within a distinct class of goods or services—for example, the Apple technology company’s trademark coexists with Apple trademarks held by a bank, an insurance company, and a travel company.”

According to the group, these new protection mechanisms could interfere with free expression.

They added: “The objective of the new Trademark Clearinghouse was to protect the legitimate interests of trademark owners as established by trademark law.”

“We believe this objective can be achieved without harming the competing interests of other users of the domain name system.”

More news
The latest news from IPPro The Internet
Join Our Newsletter

Sign up today and never
miss the latest news or an issue again

Subscribe now
Safe harbour reforms dropped from Australian bill
24 March 2017 | Canberra | Reporter: Barney Dixon
The reforms may have delayed passage of other important provisions
FilmOn X fails to get judicial support
23 March 2017 | California | Reporter: Barney Dixon
Classing the service as a ‘cable provider’ could “jeopardise” the values of the Copyright Act
Supreme Court rules in Star Athletica v Varsity Brands
23 March 2017 | Washington DC | Reporter: Barney Dixon
Ruling heralded as a “big step forward for clothing designers”
Amazon to broaden anti-counterfeiting programme
22 March 2017 | Las Vegas | Reporter: Barney Dixon
Brands should not “rest on their laurels” when it comes to the new initiative
CJCH to spearhead government-backed anti-piracy HQ
22 March 2017 | Cardiff | Reporter: Barney Dixon
CJCH Solicitors is backed by £432,000 from the Welsh government
Owner of .feedback lacks transparency
22 March 2017 | Los Angeles | Reporter: Barney Dixon
TLS owner Jay Westerdal "disappointed in a number of factors of the ruling"
Brazil floats new copyright rules under WTO
21 March 2017 | Brasília | Reporter: Barney Dixon
The new proposals were circulated in a paper on electronic commerce and copyright