Brussels
17 February 2017
Reporter: Barney Dixon

EU's Article 13 ‘needs to be properly defined’


A rapporteur for the European Parliament committee on culture and education has submitted draft amendments to the proposed EU Digital Single Market copyright directive, arguing that Article 13 does not properly define its own scope.

The directive is part of 16 initiatives set out by the European Commission to create the Digital Single Market in Europe.

The draft opinion, submitted by rapporteur Marc Joulaud to the European Parliament committee as it considers what has been proposed, said that the proposal does not “define with enough provision” the scope of the services that will fall under Article 13 of the directive. This will create “legal uncertainty and a potential broader effect”.

Currently, Article 13 proposes that user content platforms and services such as YouTube use content recognition technologies to remove potentially infringing subject matter from their sites.

These systems would be akin to YouTube’s ContentID technology.

But, according to Joulaud, the European Commission does not “acknowledge the position consumers, as service users, now occupy in the digital environment”, and the proposal must create a “new pillar to protect consumer’s legitimate practices”.

To create this fourth pillar, a new mandatory exception should be made to protect the use of extracts of copyright-protected works in “user-generated content”.

Joulaud also tabled several other amendments relating to four key objectives, including the provision of legal certainty regarding the new exceptions and limitations.

He said: “The current proposal does not provide full legal clarity on the burden of the parties involved in each exception, which would jeopardise their effectiveness and hamper their harmonised implementation.”

Further, the proposal needs to define digital content platforms and ensure fair cooperation with rights holders.

Joulaud said that this amendment would cover specific uses of these works where use is not harmful to rights holders.

The fourth and final objective asks that the directive allow authors and performers to effectively enforce their rights, asking that disputes between authors performers and their contractual partners may be initiated “either on an individual or collective basis”.

More news
The latest news from IPPro The Internet
Join Our Newsletter

Sign up today and never
miss the latest news or an issue again

Subscribe now
PIPCU extended to 2019
23 August 2017 | London | Reporter: Barney Dixon
The UK Intellectual Property Office has granted the unit an additional £3.32 million in funding to cover the period to 30 June 2019
Atari gives Nestlé a break of its own
22 August 2017 | California | Reporter: Barney Dixon
Nestlé’s new Kit Kat advert violated Atari’s copyright and trademark rights for its 1975 Breakout video game, according to a lawsuit
MPAA secures $200,000 payout in China
22 August 2017 | Shenzhen | Reporter: Barney Dixon
The Motion Picture Association has secured more than $200,000 in damages from Chinese service provider Xunlei
Prolific counterfeiter sentenced to three years
22 August 2017 | New Jersey | Reporter: Barney Dixon
A prolific counterfeiter who smuggled fake iPhones, iPads and iPods from China to sell in the US has been sentenced to more than three years in prison
US formally institutes China IP investigation
21 August 2017 | Washington DC | Reporter: Barney Dixon
A Section 301 investigation into intellectual property malpractice in China championed by US President Donald Trump has formally launched
CIPU enters education partnership
21 August 2017 | New York | Reporter: Barney Dixon
The Center for Intellectual Property Understanding and the Michelson 20MM Foundation are partnering to improve awareness of intellectual property rights
Trumpet app maker defeats US President Donald Trump
18 August 2017 | San Francisco | Reporter: Barney Dixon
Donald Trump has lost a trademark battle against the creator of the iTrump mobile phone app, the successor to the iBone trombone simulator