Bob Barchiesi
IACC

Since the IACC’s Spring Conference, the coalition has continued its fight against counterfeiters across the globe. President Bob Barchiesi explains

What sort of improvement do you expect in combating European counterfeiters following the new MOUs with Guardia di Finanza and PIPCU?

Authorities in the EU and UK have done a stellar job in being proactive and staying vigilant on enforcing brand protection in their region. Yet, as we all know, counterfeiting is a persistent and pervasive problem. Last year, nearly €650 million worth of fake goods were seized at EU borders.

These memorandums of understanding will help fight counterfeiting in the region by improving collaboration between the public and private sectors. It gives our members an opportunity to share information about their products with authorities, and it allows us to pass along best practices and trends in anti-counterfeiting.

How will these deals work? What sorts of initiatives will be bolstered or put in place?

We will help facilitate access to brand experts throughout the EU when requested. These agreements will also have a focus on identifying and fighting online counterfeiting.

For example, the International AntiCounterfeiting Coalition (IACC)—through its RogueBlock programme—will be able to send .uk sites that rights holders have identified as selling counterfeit goods to the City of London Police Intellectual Property Crime Unit for action through its existing anti-counterfeiting programmes.

Does the IACC expect to enter more partnerships like these in the near future?

Collaboration and partnerships are key components in our anti-counterfeiting strategy, and our efforts go beyond Europe. We just signed an agreement with Saudi Arabia’s Consumer Protection Association (CPA).

The agreement reflects both organisations’ commitment to partnering with one another in advancing anti-counterfeiting initiatives both in Saudi Arabia and the broader region.

The memorandum of understanding was signed at an IP crime workshop in Riyadh, which we organised in partnership with Underwriters Laboratories (UL) and CPA. A few days before this event, we held a similar workshop in partnership with the Emirates IP Association (EIPA) and UL in Dubai.

Last year, we entered a partnership with EIPA to promote areas of cooperation, including information exchange and joint events, as well as education on the harms of IP crime.

How has the IP Crime Coordinated Coalition be received?

There has been a lot of industry support for the IP Crime Coordinated Coalition (IPC3). As a member of the IPC3’s stakeholders advisory group, the IACC is committed to lending its support to ensure its success and to share its global programmes, expertise and the voice of its members with the IPC3.

How important are international agreements in an increasingly globalised IP world?

With international IP systems in effect, complementary enforcement systems are needed. International agreements such as IACC’s are one way to support IP protection systems and to ensure an exchange of information and best practices between law enforcement across countries.

Interviews
The latest interviews from IPPro The Internet
Features
The latest features from IPPro The Internet
INTA’s anti-counterfeiting committee services its members worldwide with up-to-date enforcement advice, as Heather McDonald tells Barney Dixon
As EU copyright reform continues, publishers are insisting the press publisher’s right will be good for business and won’t harm consumers. Angela Mills Wade of the European Publishers Council explains
Join Our Newsletter

Sign up today and never
miss the latest news or an issue again

Subscribe now
ECTA’s copyright committee was formed in response to the modernisation of the EU’s approach to copyright. Chair Dr Christian Freudenberg tells Mark Dugdale what this has meant in practice
ECTA has ramped up its efforts to ensure that IP rights are heard in Brexit negotiations. But this isn’t all the trademark association has been up to in the past year, as Ruta Olmane explains
William Dyer III and Bea Koempel-Thomas of Lee & Hayes examine TC Heartland v Kraft and the arguments put forward in support of each party
As Brexit negotiations begin, it is still unclear where trademarks fit in. But, with two years to get a good deal, the UK government needs to consider all aspects
Rights holders that want to protect their valuable intellectual property have to be willing to change
Alternative dispute resolution mechanisms are not being used to their full potential, according to IPzen’s Julia Cytrynbaum
Country profiles
The latest country profiles from IPPro The Internet
While Indian fair use is not explicit, provisions exist for the fair dealing of copyright. Rohit Singh and Tina Canneth of Abu-Ghazeleh Intellectual Property delve deeper
An interpretation of the current events exception in Radosavljević is creative, say BDK Advokati's Bogdan Ivanišević and Marko Popović
IPPro Patents

Visit our sister site
for all the latest IP patents news and analysis

ippropatents.com
Yu-Li Tsai of Deep & Far examines how damages are calculated in patent infringement litigation
A recent amendment will make costly annulments a thing of the past. Gilberto Sanchez of SPECyF explains
New legislation in Turkey promises a swathe of trademark changes. Dr Cahit Suluk of Cahit Suluk Intellectual Property Law Firm explains
A trademark decision clarified ‘against the public order’ as an absolute ground for refusal. Sár and Partners – Danubia Patent & Law Office reports
Bogdan Ivanišević and Marko Popović of BDK Advokati review the recent squabble about copyright protection for ‘routinely created photos’
Alston & Bird recently expanded with a new office focusing on counselling Chinese companies on US intellectual property law. Yitai Hu explains what patent owners face when working across borders