Michael Ryan
China-Britain Business Council

The CBBC and the owner of WeChat have signed a memorandum of understanding to do more in the fight against infringement. Michael Ryan, director and head of business environment and IP at CBBC, explains

What are some of the big issues affecting British businesses’ intellectual property assets in China?

There are two frequently reported problems that the China-Britain Business Council (CBBC) deals with. The first is the registration of UK companies’ trademarks including logos and company names, which are then used by third parties to make similar goods, or are offered to the UK company for sale.

The British Embassy and CBBC are working with Chinese authorities on how laws can be updated to better protect British companies IP rights, and also to help companies understand what the laws are in China and how to utilise them effectively.

Secondly, the advertising and sale of copied designs or counterfeit goods in markets most frequently is online marketplaces such as ecommerce platforms or social media. Other issues include pirated works such as books, music, film and TV shows, and the exchange of companies’ internal proprietary documentation on cloud servers and document sharing sites. Much of this type of activity happens online because it provides a level of secrecy and anonymity to the sellers that isn’t possible offline.

What have the CBBC and WeChat owner Tencent agreed in the new memorandum of understanding? How will the agreement be implemented?

The agreement covers many areas of cooperation, of which a number have been made public:

● All parties emphasise the importance of intellectual protection, and the positive step of creating the WeChat Brand Protection Platform;
● Facilitation of CBBC and International Publishers Copyright Protection Coalition in China (IPCC) members to better utilise Tencent’s IP protection systems;
● An ‘express channel’ will be set up to prioritise the needs of CBBC and IPCC members within mainland China; and
● Stated ambitions around the development of enhanced IP protection mechanisms.

The WeChat Brand Protection Platform is a portal whereby brands can make complaints about IP infringing products, which are being advertised by third-party users for sale via the WeChat platform.
If there has been an infringement of an IP right exclusively owned by the complainant, then Weixin will remove the listing and or revoke the user’s right to operate the account.

There is also an innovative mechanism whereby consumer complaints are sent directly to rights owners for them to verify if the product advertised is IP infringing or not prior to removal.

It’s important that ecommerce and social media platforms have systems such as this (usually known as notice and takedown systems), and that they evolve over time.

CBBC welcomes the development of such systems, and hopes that by encouraging companies to use the systems then we can provide a feedback mechanism that can help Tencent to continually improve its operation.

And as part of the cooperation, the express channel will be a way of expediting CBBC and IPCC members’ requests for takedowns of infringing products, while we provide Tencent with constructive feedback on how it’s working.

Other areas of cooperation include:

● The parties will work together to explore offline cooperation with law enforcement agencies;
● Support will be provided to Tencent for any construction and improvement of technical and legal measures; and
● Regular meetings will be held to discuss systemic improvements on IP protection.

CBBC will be supporting Tencent and British brands in the pursuit of criminals (in accordance with Chinese law) that use online platforms for sale of illicit goods such as counterfeits.

There are some technical and legal issues around the gathering of electronic evidence and cross-border enforcement, which will need to be worked out through dialogue and cooperation.

Dialogue is an important aspect of any cooperation agreement, so we’ll be holding regular meetings with Tencent on behalf of British industry and together with UK brand owners in the coming months.

How successful has the agreement between CBBC and Alibaba Group been? What has it entailed?

The CBBC-Alibaba Group agreement on IP protection since 2014 has been hailed as a success by both UK industry and government, so we’re keen to emulate it across internet companies in China more broadly. Alibaba and CBBC meet almost every month to have in-depth discussions together with British brand owners about IP protection, or to provide training or sharing on best practices for online IP enforcement. One area we’ve made real headway with is with offline IP enforcement (catching criminals). CBBC supported a project together with Alibaba’s investigations team and leading British engine lubricant producers in 2015 where we uncovered a network of counterfeit manufacturers, distributors and sellers across six provinces. It led to 22 arrests and the confiscation of RMB 120 million ($17 million) worth of oils, which was the largest enforcement by Alibaba in 2015.

This year Alibaba and CBBC have got an even bigger enforcement project ongoing regarding the trade in counterfeits between China and Southeast Asia. These enforcements send a strong message to infringers and would be criminals to think twice before using online platforms to sell counterfeit goods. The UK IP minister, Baroness Neville-Rolfe said at the UK-China IP Symposium: “The Alibaba-CBBC IP agreement has improved the global ecommerce environment, making it safer for consumers and the small businesses that use Alibaba sites as part of their supply chain.”

What is CBBC working on in this area for the future?

CBBC is continuing and broadening the scope of our cooperation with Alibaba this year, and we’ll be looking to use our Tencent agreement as a springboard for IP protection collaboration regarding WeChat too.

We’re also having less formal discussions with business-to-consumer ecommerce platforms such as JD.com and Suning.com, which is a different situation in terms of IP protection issues because there are more restrictions for sellers. And we’re talking with search engine Baidu about copyright protection, including in support of a cooperation agreement that it has with CBBC’s close partner, the IPCC.

We’re also working with the UK government and British brands on trying to disrupt trade links in counterfeit goods between China and Southeast Asia. Note that Southeast Asia is rising as an exporter and China has been rising in terms of consumer buying power, so we’re starting to track the flow of counterfeit goods being imported into China in addition to combating traditional flow of exports from China.

CBBC will also be supporting UK government work in bilateral IP events, such as the annual UK-China IP Symposium, and important governmental visits going from China to the UK, or from the UK to China.

Interviews
The latest interviews from IPPro The Internet
Features
The latest features from IPPro The Internet
Dineo Modibedi and Kelly Thompson of South African law firm Adams and Adams discuss a recent case involving PepsiCo and Coca-Cola
With EU copyright reforms coming to a head, Barney Dixon speaks to Raegan MacDonald to see how the landscape has changed in recent months
Join Our Newsletter

Sign up today and never
miss the latest news or an issue again

Subscribe now
Le Quang Vinh of Bross & Partners examines the substantive changes to criminal law in Vietnam that promise to rein in counterfeiting and piracy
As EU copyright reform continues, publishers are insisting the press publisher’s right will be good for business and won’t harm consumers. Angela Mills Wade of the European Publishers Council explains
ECTA’s copyright committee was formed in response to the modernisation of the EU’s approach to copyright. Chair Dr Christian Freudenberg tells Mark Dugdale what this has meant in practice
ECTA has ramped up its efforts to ensure that IP rights are heard in Brexit negotiations. But this isn’t all the trademark association has been up to in the past year, as Ruta Olmane explains
William Dyer III and Bea Koempel-Thomas of Lee & Hayes examine TC Heartland v Kraft and the arguments put forward in support of each party
As Brexit negotiations begin, it is still unclear where trademarks fit in. But, with two years to get a good deal, the UK government needs to consider all aspects
Country profiles
The latest country profiles from IPPro The Internet
While Indian fair use is not explicit, provisions exist for the fair dealing of copyright. Rohit Singh and Tina Canneth of Abu-Ghazeleh Intellectual Property delve deeper
An interpretation of the current events exception in Radosavljević is creative, say BDK Advokati's Bogdan Ivanišević and Marko Popović
IPPro Patents

Visit our sister site
for all the latest IP patents news and analysis

ippropatents.com
Yu-Li Tsai of Deep & Far examines how damages are calculated in patent infringement litigation
A recent amendment will make costly annulments a thing of the past. Gilberto Sanchez of SPECyF explains
New legislation in Turkey promises a swathe of trademark changes. Dr Cahit Suluk of Cahit Suluk Intellectual Property Law Firm explains
A trademark decision clarified ‘against the public order’ as an absolute ground for refusal. Sár and Partners – Danubia Patent & Law Office reports
Bogdan Ivanišević and Marko Popović of BDK Advokati review the recent squabble about copyright protection for ‘routinely created photos’
Alston & Bird recently expanded with a new office focusing on counselling Chinese companies on US intellectual property law. Yitai Hu explains what patent owners face when working across borders