Out of tune
Bobby Ghajar, new partner at Cooley in Los Angeles, considers the confluence of agendas at play in the quest for DMCA reform

What is the copyright landscape like right now for the music business? Are their rights losing value online?

For years, people have debated the effect of online music distribution on the value of music. We have seen that artists, publishers, and consumers have enjoyed greater access and interaction with music online. Consumers are spending money on music subscriptions and music downloads, arguably more than they were spending on CDs or singles. I believe there will always be debate over which party is enjoying the greatest benefit from online music distribution.

On the legal front, we have seen recent litigation involving the use of music, ranging from the well-reported Blurred Lines case, to a recent decision in one appellate court allowing the sampling of a split second of music, which was at odds with an earlier decision out of another appellate court.

Do you expect any meaningful reform of the DMCA’s takedown system, for both copyright owners dissatisfied with its effectiveness and internet users who feel unfairly targeted by takedown requests?

There are always talks about reform, just as there are complaints from both sides about perceived problems with the current law. A few years ago, allegedly improper Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) takedowns were a hot topic, which led to well-publicised litigation.

Some artists have criticised the DMCA as being technologically-outdated and as providing an unfair advantage to platforms. Other groups have campaigned against what they call DMCA abuse. Yet others complain that as soon as one infringement is taken down, another identical infringement pops up in its place.

I am aware that the US Patent and Trademark Office and other organisations have held meetings to discuss improvements and modifications to the takedown provisions, including the possibility of a standardized form of notice. Even the US Copyright Office has held roundtables on the subject and is in the process of evaluating Section 512—this might eventually lead to legislative reform.

What about the safe harbour provisions—are they out of date?

I don’t know that the safe harbour provisions are “out of date”, but as technology evolves into a greater reliance on social media and virtual reality, I expect that policies will evolve with them. As noted, many have criticised the 18-year old DMCA as being technologically out-of-date.

There are discussions at the roundtables about how one might use technology to ferret out infringing uses (mitigating the need for a copyright owner to send multiple takedown notices).

What do you make of platforms taking it upon themselves to resolve disputes that have traditionally been resolved in a court of law? Is this the future of law where the internet is concerned?

This is not uncommon, and many consumers and brand owners expect platforms to have mechanisms to deal with abuse and infringement. The larger, established platforms have dispute procedures (for example, eBay’s VeRO programme) that have been lauded by the courts as an effective means for the platform to give users the ability to send takedowns. It remains to be seen whether music distribution platforms will adopt similar mechanisms, or whether technology develops in a way that streamlines the real disputes.

The latest features from IPPro The Internet
The US Supreme Court’s ruling in Star Athletica v Varsity Brands provides a path to copyrightability for pictorial or graphical elements of clothing designs and useful articles. Laura Ganoza and Julie McGinnis of Foley & Lardner explain
As Brexit negotiations begin, it is still unclear where trademarks fit in. But, with two years to get a good deal, the UK government needs to consider all aspects
Join Our Newsletter

Sign up today and never
miss the latest news or an issue again

Subscribe now
Rights holders that want to protect their valuable intellectual property have to be willing to change
Alternative dispute resolution mechanisms are not being used to their full potential, according to IPzen’s Julia Cytrynbaum
India's copyright societies are subject to interim measures that boost transparency. DPS Parmar and Aniruddh Singh of LexOrbis report
Courts are wrestling with the legal definition of users of social networks. Nathalie Dreyfus examines how they have done so far
The BRICS IP Forum and the IP Summit allowed intellectual property professionals to reflect on a topsy-turvy 2016, and hope for a simpler 2017
Experts discuss what brands can do to protect their trademarks online during the Cyber Monday sales, with fakes widely available
Country profiles
The latest country profiles from IPPro The Internet
While Indian fair use is not explicit, provisions exist for the fair dealing of copyright. Rohit Singh and Tina Canneth of Abu-Ghazeleh Intellectual Property delve deeper
An interpretation of the current events exception in Radosavljević is creative, say BDK Advokati's Bogdan Ivanišević and Marko Popović
IPPro Patents

Visit our sister site
for all the latest IP patents news and analysis

Yu-Li Tsai of Deep & Far examines how damages are calculated in patent infringement litigation
A recent amendment will make costly annulments a thing of the past. Gilberto Sanchez of SPECyF explains
New legislation in Turkey promises a swathe of trademark changes. Dr Cahit Suluk of Cahit Suluk Intellectual Property Law Firm explains
A trademark decision clarified ‘against the public order’ as an absolute ground for refusal. Sár and Partners – Danubia Patent & Law Office reports
Bogdan Ivanišević and Marko Popović of BDK Advokati review the recent squabble about copyright protection for ‘routinely created photos’
Alston & Bird recently expanded with a new office focusing on counselling Chinese companies on US intellectual property law. Yitai Hu explains what patent owners face when working across borders
The latest interviews from IPPro The Internet