China


Alston & Bird recently expanded with a new office focusing on counselling Chinese companies on US intellectual property law. Yitai Hu explains what patent owners face when working across borders

Why did Alston & Bird open its new office in Beijing?

The firm has long represented Chinese clients in high-stake litigation and other transactional matters. With increased business dealings between China and the US, our clients are in need of real-time access to our attorneys and it also opens up opportunities for the firm to attract clients who are now navigating through the unfamiliar US legal landscape.

What issues will the office’s Chinese clients often face when dealing with US patent law?

They are now dealing with an entirely different legal landscape and the harsh reality of an unfair perception and unflattering stereotypes associated with a Chinese company.

What are the key differences between US and Chinese patent laws that they need to be aware of?

Chinese companies are often surprised that patent cases are tried before a jury and the amount of damages that may be awarded, not to mention the discovery obligations.

How challenging of a forum is the International Trade Commission for Chinese companies importing goods into the US?

Ironically, many Chinese companies are very aware of an International Trade Commission investigation and therefore are relatively prepared, at least psychologically. However, the reality of its speed, breadth of investigation and high legal expense still present tremendous challenges for companies.

What do you advise Chinese companies to do if they expect to infringe upon entering the US? How useful of an avenue is licensing?

Be proactive. Actively investigate if there are any patent issues with their products and design around them if possible.

They should explore possible licensing options, but understand that getting a licence from one patent owner does not mean their products are free and clear of all patent issues.

They should also be prepared to deal with ‘patent trolls’, like every other company doing business in the US.

Country profiles
The latest country profiles from IPPro The Internet
While Indian fair use is not explicit, provisions exist for the fair dealing of copyright. Rohit Singh and Tina Canneth of Abu-Ghazeleh Intellectual Property delve deeper
An interpretation of the current events exception in Radosavljević is creative, say BDK Advokati's Bogdan Ivanišević and Marko Popović
IPPro Patents

Visit our sister site
for all the latest IP patents news and analysis

ippropatents.com
Yu-Li Tsai of Deep & Far examines how damages are calculated in patent infringement litigation
A recent amendment will make costly annulments a thing of the past. Gilberto Sanchez of SPECyF explains
New legislation in Turkey promises a swathe of trademark changes. Dr Cahit Suluk of Cahit Suluk Intellectual Property Law Firm explains
A trademark decision clarified ‘against the public order’ as an absolute ground for refusal. Sár and Partners – Danubia Patent & Law Office reports
Bogdan Ivanišević and Marko Popović of BDK Advokati review the recent squabble about copyright protection for ‘routinely created photos’
Alston & Bird recently expanded with a new office focusing on counselling Chinese companies on US intellectual property law. Yitai Hu explains what patent owners face when working across borders
Features
The latest features from IPPro The Internet
Dineo Modibedi and Kelly Thompson of South African law firm Adams and Adams discuss a recent case involving PepsiCo and Coca-Cola
With EU copyright reforms coming to a head, Barney Dixon speaks to Raegan MacDonald to see how the landscape has changed in recent months
Join Our Newsletter

Sign up today and never
miss the latest news or an issue again

Subscribe now
Le Quang Vinh of Bross & Partners examines the substantive changes to criminal law in Vietnam that promise to rein in counterfeiting and piracy
As EU copyright reform continues, publishers are insisting the press publisher’s right will be good for business and won’t harm consumers. Angela Mills Wade of the European Publishers Council explains
ECTA’s copyright committee was formed in response to the modernisation of the EU’s approach to copyright. Chair Dr Christian Freudenberg tells Mark Dugdale what this has meant in practice
ECTA has ramped up its efforts to ensure that IP rights are heard in Brexit negotiations. But this isn’t all the trademark association has been up to in the past year, as Ruta Olmane explains
William Dyer III and Bea Koempel-Thomas of Lee & Hayes examine TC Heartland v Kraft and the arguments put forward in support of each party
As Brexit negotiations begin, it is still unclear where trademarks fit in. But, with two years to get a good deal, the UK government needs to consider all aspects
Interviews
The latest interviews from IPPro The Internet