Iceland
Intellectual property rights in Iceland are becoming more international, as Ólafur Ragnarsson of Patice IP Legal explains

Iceland is a member of the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) and a party to most major international IP protection agreements.

IP rights and their protection are substantially dependent on international cooperation. Iceland is a party to a number of international agreements, including: The Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property, the Berne Convention for the Protection of Literacy and Artistic Works, the Trade Mark Protocol Relating to the Madrid Agreement, the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT), the Geneva Act of the Hague Agreement Concerning the International Registration of Industrial Designs and the European Patent Convention (EPC).

Moreover, Iceland, as a member of the World Trade Organization (WTO), has adapted Icelandic legislation to the provisions of TRIPS (Trade-Related Aspects of IP Rights).

Furthermore, the Agreement on the European Economic Area (EEA) has led to several legislative amendments in Iceland to accord with the directives and regulations of the EU.

The Agreement on the EEA is an agreement between the European Free Trade Association (EFTA) and the EU.

EFTA consists of four countries: Switzerland (Switzerland is not a member of the EEA), Norway, Iceland and Lichtenstein, while the EU consists of 28 countries.

The changes to Icelandic law allow foreign agents to represent IP rights owners before the Icelandic authorities, but they must reside within the EU or the EEA.

However, all communication between representatives and the Icelandic Patent Office (IPO) must be in Icelandic.

Obtaining IP protection in Iceland

Patents

Patents protect the technical realisation of an idea, such as equipment and products, as well as methods or applications.

The basic requirements for granting a patent for an invention are that it be new, inventive and capable of industrial application:

  • New: the invention must be new, not only in Iceland, but worldwide. The invention may not have been publicised in speech, or in writing, before an application for a patent is filed.

  • Inventive: the invention must differ essentially from prior art, ie, the solution to the problem it resolves may not be obvious to a person skilled in the art.

  • Capable of industrial application: the invention must be of practical economic use, ie, it must be possible to manufacture and sell it. Patents granted by the IPO protect inventions for up to 20 years in Iceland.


  • The exclusive rights established in patent legislation entitle the proprietor to prohibit others from manufacturing, importing and selling an invention protected by a patent.

    Patent application

    Applications for patents in Iceland shall be submitted to the IPO. An application form must be filed in and filed together with a detailed description of the invention, as provided for in the Icelandic Patents Act.

    The patent claims, abstract, and the text on the drawing to be published will be made available in Icelandic translation before the application is made accessible to the public.

    The description shall be available translated into Icelandic or into English before the patent is granted.

    Origin of the Icelandic patent applications

    The majority of patent applications in Iceland come through the European Patent Office (EPO) as national validations of European patents. Valid registered patents at the end year 2013 were 3817. Of those, 592 were national patents and 3225 were European patents. Iceland has been a member of the European Patent Convention (EPC) since 2004.

    Trademarks

    Definition and use

    Trademarks are used to label goods and services. Trademarks may be any type of visible sign used to differentiate the goods or services of one party from the goods or services of other parties. Moreover, trademarks are often used as company names and domain names.

    Rights

    The rights established by trademarks legislation entitle a trademark proprietor to exclusive rights to use the trademark in Iceland and, as a result, the right to prohibit others from using, for commercial purposes, marks that are identical or similar to its own trademark.

    Trademark rights are obtainable through use or by registration. Registered trademark is valid for 10 years at a time and is renewable for as long as the trademark owner desires.

    Changes to the Trademark Act

    In June 2012, invalidation of registered trademarks due to non-use became possible through administrative decision. Another notable change is that a trademark cannot be registered if it is confusingly similar to a mark that has been in use in another country, provided that the application is in the same or similar class of goods or services as the foreign mark and the applicant is aware of or should have been aware of the foreign mark.

    Applications and valid registrations

    Applications for trademarks shall be submitted to the IPO. An application form must be filled in and filed together with a detailed description of the trademark. There were 85,882 valid registered trademarks in Iceland at the end of 2013.

    Of those, 54,431 were national trademarks and 31,451 were international trademarks. Iceland has been a member of the Madrid Protocol since 1997.

    Designs

    Definitions

    A design is defined by the visible appearance of a product. Even if a product has a technical function, only its appearance is protected by design protection. The goods can be handmade or mass-produced. Examples of goods that can enjoy design protection include furniture, clothing, packaging, machinery, tools, foodstuffs and jewellery.

    A product need not be in three-dimensional form to enjoy protection.

    It can be two-dimensional, such as a screen display on a computer, a graphic symbol, or a decoration on another product, such as wallpaper.

    The more original and innovative the design is, the greater the likelihood it can be protected.

    Rights

    Registering a design grants the owner of the registration exclusive rights to utilise that design and the right to ban others from utilising the design in question. Design rights are obtainable only through registration. Applications submitted to the IPO apply in Iceland.

    However, it is also possible to apply for an international registration of a design (Hague system). Iceland has been a member of the Geneva Act of the Hague Agreement for the International Registration of Industrial Designs since 2004.

    By registering a design with the IPO, it is possible to protect the design for 25 years.
    Copyright

    Copyright has become of immediate interest due to the new digital technology, which has resulted in movies and music being distributed differently than before.

    Customs control

    Pirate copying of goods and illegal parallel imports are an increasing challenge. IP attorneys assist with solutions to prevent the import and sale of such goods, particularly by the assistance of custom control and handling legal conflicts.

    An international network exists that makes it possible to meet such problems abroad.

    Licensing IP rights

    A licence includes permission to use an IP right under defined conditions. A licence denotes the permission to use the right within a defined time, context, market line, or territory. An assignment denotes the transfer of ownership (title).

    Accordingly, an assignment conveys ownership, but ownership remains with the licensor.

    In IP law, important distinctions exist between “exclusive licences” and “non-exclusive licences”. An exclusive licence does not necessarily mean that this is the one and only licence granted by the licensor.

    More commonly, the licence is exclusive as to a defined scope such as product line, context of use, territory, or time period.

    In an exclusive licence, the licensor expressly or impliedly promise the licensee that the licensor will not grant other licences of the same rights within the same scope or field covered by the terms of the exclusive licence.

    However, the owner of rights can grant as many non-exclusive licences of the same rights as it chooses.

    A compulsory licence allows certain parties to make certain uses of IP rights without the explicit permission of the owner concerned.

    Patent licensing in Iceland

    A licence to exploit patents or applications is considered an exclusive patent licence unless non-exclusivity is expressed clearly in the patent licence agreement.

    It is not compulsory to record the granted licence in the Register of Patents. In practice, the IPO recommends strongly to always register the grant of a licence.

    Not doing so can under certain circumstances cause the loss of the licensor’s rights.

    It is a general rule that a compulsory licence may only be granted to a person who has not been able to reach an agreement to obtain a licence on reasonable terms and may be presumed to be capable of exploiting the invention in a reasonable and acceptable way and in accordance with the terms of the licence.

    Trademark licensing in Iceland

    The trademark owner should exercise control over the nature and quality of the goods or services sold by the licensee under the licensed mark.

    Licensing of a mark without adequate quality control is ‘naked licensing’, which raises the risk that the public will be deceived into thinking that the goods or services provided by the uncontrolled licensee are of the same general nature and quality as those previously provided, or as those provided by other licensees.

    This can result in the mark ceasing to serve as a symbol of quality and controlled source, causing the mark to become ‘abandoned’ in the sense that the word or symbol no longer has significance as an identifying mark.

    The proprietor of a trademark may grant others authorisation to use the mark commercially (a licence).

    Licences may be exclusive or non-exclusive and may cover all or part of the goods or services for which a trademark has been registered.

    Unless it is expressly agreed, a licensee may not transfer its rights. The proprietor of a trademark or licensee may request that a licence be entered in the Register of Trade Marks.

    Country profiles
    The latest country profiles from IPPro The Internet
    While Indian fair use is not explicit, provisions exist for the fair dealing of copyright. Rohit Singh and Tina Canneth of Abu-Ghazeleh Intellectual Property delve deeper
    An interpretation of the current events exception in Radosavljević is creative, say BDK Advokati's Bogdan Ivanišević and Marko Popović
    IPPro Patents

    Visit our sister site
    for all the latest IP patents news and analysis

    ippropatents.com
    Yu-Li Tsai of Deep & Far examines how damages are calculated in patent infringement litigation
    A recent amendment will make costly annulments a thing of the past. Gilberto Sanchez of SPECyF explains
    New legislation in Turkey promises a swathe of trademark changes. Dr Cahit Suluk of Cahit Suluk Intellectual Property Law Firm explains
    A trademark decision clarified ‘against the public order’ as an absolute ground for refusal. Sár and Partners – Danubia Patent & Law Office reports
    Bogdan Ivanišević and Marko Popović of BDK Advokati review the recent squabble about copyright protection for ‘routinely created photos’
    Alston & Bird recently expanded with a new office focusing on counselling Chinese companies on US intellectual property law. Yitai Hu explains what patent owners face when working across borders
    Features
    The latest features from IPPro The Internet
    With the launch of a new anti-piracy HQ in Wales, CJCH Solicitors stands firmly against intellectual property infringement and the problems that go with it. Stephen Clarke and Tony Crampton explain
    While a new general election in the UK adds to Brexit uncertainty, ECTA has ramped up its efforts to ensure that IP rights are heard in negotiations. But this isn’t all the trademark association has been up to in the past year, as Ruta Olmane explains
    Join Our Newsletter

    Sign up today and never
    miss the latest news or an issue again

    Subscribe now
    William Dyer III and Bea Koempel-Thomas of Lee & Hayes examine TC Heartland v Kraft and the arguments put forward in support of each party
    As Brexit negotiations begin, it is still unclear where trademarks fit in. But, with two years to get a good deal, the UK government needs to consider all aspects
    Rights holders that want to protect their valuable intellectual property have to be willing to change
    Alternative dispute resolution mechanisms are not being used to their full potential, according to IPzen’s Julia Cytrynbaum
    India's copyright societies are subject to interim measures that boost transparency. DPS Parmar and Aniruddh Singh of LexOrbis report
    Courts are wrestling with the legal definition of users of social networks. Nathalie Dreyfus examines how they have done so far
    Interviews
    The latest interviews from IPPro The Internet